PortfoliosLab logo
UL vs. K
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UL and K is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

UL vs. K - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Unilever Group (UL) and Kellogg Company (K). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UL:

1.00

K:

1.77

Sortino Ratio

UL:

1.57

K:

5.20

Omega Ratio

UL:

1.22

K:

1.84

Calmar Ratio

UL:

1.29

K:

2.15

Martin Ratio

UL:

2.74

K:

12.59

Ulcer Index

UL:

7.48%

K:

2.87%

Daily Std Dev

UL:

18.80%

K:

21.16%

Max Drawdown

UL:

-53.55%

K:

-55.91%

Current Drawdown

UL:

-6.10%

K:

-0.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UL:

$153.47B

K:

$28.62B

EPS

UL:

$2.59

K:

$3.97

PE Ratio

UL:

24.13

K:

20.78

PEG Ratio

UL:

3.03

K:

3.57

PS Ratio

UL:

2.53

K:

2.27

PB Ratio

UL:

6.79

K:

7.31

Total Revenue (TTM)

UL:

$60.76B

K:

$12.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UL:

$60.76B

K:

$4.57B

EBITDA (TTM)

UL:

$13.01B

K:

$2.34B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly higher than K's 2.35% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UL having a 6.62% annualized return and K not far behind at 6.54%.


UL

YTD

9.26%

1M

-0.76%

6M

6.39%

1Y

18.61%

5Y*

7.23%

10Y*

6.62%

K

YTD

2.35%

1M

0.01%

6M

2.90%

1Y

37.15%

5Y*

10.27%

10Y*

6.54%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

UL vs. K — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UL is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UL is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UL is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UL is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UL is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UL is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

K
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of K is 9797
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of K is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of K is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of K is 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of K is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of K is 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UL vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Unilever Group (UL) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current UL Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the K Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UL and K, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

UL vs. K - Dividend Comparison

UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than K's 2.76% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UL
The Unilever Group
3.05%3.29%3.83%3.61%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.82%3.44%3.06%3.72%
K
Kellogg Company
2.76%2.79%3.99%3.28%3.58%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%2.90%

Drawdowns

UL vs. K - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, roughly equal to the maximum K drawdown of -55.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and K. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

UL vs. K - Volatility Comparison

The Unilever Group (UL) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to Kellogg Company (K) at 0.80%. This indicates that UL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than K based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

UL vs. K - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Unilever Group and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


5.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20212022202320242025
29.64B
3.08B
(UL) Total Revenue
(K) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UL vs. K - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Unilever Group and Kellogg Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
34.4%
(UL) Gross Margin
(K) Gross Margin
UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 29.64B and revenue of 29.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

K - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 3.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 3.45B and revenue of 29.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

K - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 430.00M and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.04B and revenue of 29.64B, resulting in a net margin of 6.9%.

K - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 304.00M and revenue of 3.08B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.