UL vs. K
UL (Unilever PLC) and K (Kellogg Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — UL in Household & Personal Products, K in Packaged Foods. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
UL vs. K - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UL
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 7.84%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 6.22%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 5.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.56%
K
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $340.84M | $286.47M | $254.19M |
UL vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UL Unilever PLC | 2.66% | 5.96% | 20.90% | -0.17% | -2.82% | -7.61% | 9.04% | 12.88% | -2.34% | 40.15% |
K Kellogg Company | 0.00% | 5.99% | 49.75% | -7.44% | 14.35% | 7.44% | -6.78% | 26.08% | -13.32% | -4.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between UL and K is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1988 | 0.30 |
The correlation between UL and K shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.34 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
UL:
$142.18B
K:
$29.20B
UL:
€5.38
K:
$3.65
UL:
10.76
K:
22.87
UL:
2.11
K:
3.84
UL:
1.14
K:
2.30
UL:
€111.11B
K:
$12.67B
UL:
€111.26B
K:
$4.41B
UL:
€24.12B
K:
$2.25B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UL vs. K — Risk / Return Rank
UL
K
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
UL vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unilever PLC (UL) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UL | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UL vs. K - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UL | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.55% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.13% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.99% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.63% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.43% | — | — |
Volatility
UL vs. K - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UL | K | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.13% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.13% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.28% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.74% | — | — |
Dividends
UL vs. K - Dividend Comparison
UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, while K has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
K Kellogg Company | 1.39% | 2.76% | 2.79% | 10.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% | 3.66% | 3.27% | 3.86% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.74% |
UL Unilever PLC | 3.45% | 3.51% | 3.29% | 3.83% | 3.57% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.18% | 3.49% | 2.80% | 3.42% | 3.02% |
Financials
UL vs. K - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Unilever PLC and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UL and K have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for UL and K
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer