PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UL vs. K
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UL vs. K - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Unilever Group (UL) and Kellogg Company (K). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UL

1D
1.11%
1M
2.06%
YTD
-9.16%
6M
-8.88%
1Y
-13.57%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
0.77%
10Y*
4.83%

K

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UL vs. K - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UL
The Unilever Group
-9.16%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%
K
Kellogg Company
0.00%5.99%49.75%-7.44%14.35%7.44%-6.78%26.08%-13.32%-4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between UL and K is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1988

0.30

The correlation between UL and K shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.35 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UL:

$128.21B

K:

$29.20B

EPS

UL:

€5.06

K:

$3.65

PE Ratio

UL:

10.01

K:

22.87

PEG Ratio

UL:

1.96

K:

3.84

PS Ratio

UL:

1.08

K:

2.30

PB Ratio

UL:

7.17

K:

6.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

UL:

€109.27B

K:

$12.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UL:

€90.89B

K:

$4.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

UL:

€24.12B

K:

$2.25B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UL vs. K — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

K

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UL vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Unilever Group (UL) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.10

UL vs. K - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UL vs. K - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-20.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.37%

Volatility

UL vs. K - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.61%

Dividends

UL vs. K - Dividend Comparison

UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, while K has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K
Kellogg Company
1.39%2.76%2.79%10.56%3.28%3.59%3.66%3.27%3.86%3.12%2.77%2.74%
UL
The Unilever Group
3.90%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

UL vs. K - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Unilever Group and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20212022202320242025
18.38B
3.26B
(UL) Total Revenue
(K) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UL values in EUR, K values in USD

UL vs. K - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between The Unilever Group and Kellogg Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202120222023202420250
33.3%
Portfolio components
UL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 18.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

K - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a gross profit of 1.08B and revenue of 3.26B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.3%.

UL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported an operating income of 4.13B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

K - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported an operating income of 452.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

UL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Unilever Group reported a net income of 2.56B and revenue of 18.38B, resulting in a net margin of 14.0%.

K - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kellogg Company reported a net income of 309.00M and revenue of 3.26B, resulting in a net margin of 9.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UL and K have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UL and K

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer