UL vs. K
Compare and contrast key facts about The Unilever Group (UL) and Kellogg Company (K).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UL or K.
Performance
UL vs. K - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a 22.89% return, which is significantly lower than K's 48.80% return. Over the past 10 years, UL has outperformed K with an annualized return of 6.80%, while K has yielded a comparatively lower 5.35% annualized return.
UL
22.89%
-6.12%
7.69%
24.69%
3.38%
6.80%
K
48.80%
0.12%
34.30%
58.75%
11.20%
5.35%
Fundamentals
UL | K | |
---|---|---|
Market Cap | $142.47B | $27.84B |
EPS | $2.79 | $2.99 |
PE Ratio | 20.63 | 27.02 |
PEG Ratio | 16.02 | 1.64 |
Total Revenue (TTM) | $60.29B | $12.80B |
Gross Profit (TTM) | $25.86B | $4.48B |
EBITDA (TTM) | $11.95B | $1.89B |
Key characteristics
UL | K | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 1.57 | 2.30 |
Sortino Ratio | 2.46 | 4.80 |
Omega Ratio | 1.31 | 1.59 |
Calmar Ratio | 1.49 | 1.35 |
Martin Ratio | 7.04 | 15.68 |
Ulcer Index | 3.55% | 3.78% |
Daily Std Dev | 15.88% | 25.79% |
Max Drawdown | -53.55% | -82.53% |
Current Drawdown | -11.43% | -8.84% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between UL and K is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UL vs. K - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Unilever Group (UL) and Kellogg Company (K). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UL vs. K - Dividend Comparison
UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than K's 2.78% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Unilever Group | 3.24% | 3.83% | 3.61% | 3.77% | 3.07% | 3.17% | 3.46% | 2.79% | 3.40% | 3.02% | 3.69% | 3.39% |
Kellogg Company | 2.78% | 10.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% | 3.01% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UL vs. K - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum K drawdown of -82.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and K. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UL vs. K - Volatility Comparison
The Unilever Group (UL) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Kellogg Company (K) at 1.16%. This indicates that UL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than K based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
UL vs. K - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Unilever Group and Kellogg Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities