PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UL vs. NSRGY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UL vs. NSRGY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Unilever PLC (UL) and Nestlé S.A. (NSRGY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UL achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than NSRGY's 7.21% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: UL at 5.78% and NSRGY at 5.78%.


UL

1D
-1.30%
1M
7.84%
6M
0.92%
YTD
2.66%
1Y
2.23%
3Y*
6.22%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
5.78%
ALL TIME*
9.56%

NSRGY

1D
1.37%
1M
-2.68%
6M
13.04%
YTD
7.21%
1Y
17.97%
3Y*
-2.88%
5Y*
-1.32%
10Y*
5.78%
ALL TIME*
3.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$43.39M$55.54M$45.44M
$340.84M$286.47M$254.19M

UL vs. NSRGY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UL
Unilever PLC
2.66%5.96%20.90%-0.17%-2.82%-7.61%9.04%12.88%-2.34%40.15%
NSRGY
Nestlé S.A.
7.21%24.80%-27.05%2.88%-15.94%22.32%11.63%37.26%-2.74%27.45%

Correlation

The correlation between UL and NSRGY is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2007

0.51

The correlation between UL and NSRGY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UL:

$142.18B

NSRGY:

$261.80B

EPS

UL:

€5.38

NSRGY:

CHF 6.90

PE Ratio

UL:

10.76

NSRGY:

12.07

PS Ratio

UL:

1.14

NSRGY:

1.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

UL:

€111.11B

NSRGY:

CHF 179.82B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UL:

€111.26B

NSRGY:

CHF 82.84B

EBITDA (TTM)

UL:

€24.12B

NSRGY:

CHF 35.74B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UL vs. NSRGY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UL
UL Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
UL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UL Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
UL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
UL Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

NSRGY
NSRGY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
NSRGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NSRGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
NSRGY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
NSRGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NSRGY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UL vs. NSRGY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Unilever PLC (UL) and Nestlé S.A. (NSRGY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ULNSRGYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.16

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.09

1.28

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.17

2.71

-2.54

UL vs. NSRGY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UL Sharpe Ratio is 0.09, which is lower than the NSRGY Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UL and NSRGY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UL vs. NSRGY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UL drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum NSRGY drawdown of -75.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UL and NSRGY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULNSRGYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.55%

-75.68%

+22.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.09%

-14.10%

-10.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.09%

-32.45%

+7.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.09%

-38.24%

+13.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.13%

-38.24%

+8.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.99%

-16.03%

+6.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.63%

-24.10%

+13.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.43%

6.66%

+6.77%

Volatility

UL vs. NSRGY - Volatility Comparison

Unilever PLC (UL) has a higher volatility of 11.13% compared to Nestlé S.A. (NSRGY) at 9.62%. This indicates that UL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NSRGY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULNSRGYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.13%

9.62%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.57%

17.15%

+2.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.13%

23.19%

+0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.28%

20.37%

+0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.74%

18.58%

+3.16%

Dividends

UL vs. NSRGY - Dividend Comparison

UL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, less than NSRGY's 3.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NSRGY
Nestlé S.A.
3.94%3.44%4.01%2.86%2.57%2.18%2.34%2.28%3.12%5.64%6.54%3.13%
UL
Unilever PLC
3.45%3.51%3.29%3.83%3.57%3.77%3.07%3.18%3.49%2.80%3.42%3.02%

Financials

UL vs. NSRGY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Unilever PLC and Nestlé S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UL and NSRGY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UL has higher volatility (11.13%) compared to NSRGY (9.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UL dropped -53.55% vs NSRGY's -75.68%.

NSRGY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UL and NSRGY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer