UJB vs. NOBL
UJB (ProShares Ultra High Yield) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UJB is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UJB returned 6.36%/yr vs 9.51%/yr for NOBL. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UJB charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
UJB vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UJB achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 3.51% return. Over the past 10 years, UJB has underperformed NOBL with an annualized return of 6.36%, while NOBL has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.
UJB
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 11.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 6.36%
NOBL
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 3.45%
- 1Y
- 9.00%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 9.51%
UJB vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UJB ProShares Ultra High Yield | 0.81% | 12.22% | 9.41% | 17.70% | -23.27% | 6.96% | 5.19% | 26.68% | -6.08% | 11.77% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.51% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 21.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between UJB and NOBL is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013 | 0.44 |
The correlation between UJB and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UJB vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UJB
NOBL
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
UJB
NOBL
Basic Materials
UJB
-
NOBL
Communication Services
UJB
-
NOBL
-
Consumer Cyclical
UJB
-
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
UJB
-
NOBL
Financial Services
UJB
-
NOBL
Healthcare
UJB
-
NOBL
Industrials
UJB
-
NOBL
Real Estate
UJB
-
NOBL
Technology
UJB
-
NOBL
Utilities
UJB
-
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UJB vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
UJB
NOBL
UJB vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UJB | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.14 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.69 | 0.99 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.20 | 2.58 | +4.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UJB | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 0.80 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.35 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.57 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.64 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
UJB vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UJB drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UJB and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UJB | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.14% | -35.43% | -4.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.01% | -9.11% | +4.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.47% | -15.36% | +5.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.14% | -17.92% | -12.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.14% | -35.43% | -4.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.85% | -5.99% | +5.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.17% | -3.48% | -2.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 3.50% | -2.33% |
Volatility
UJB vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra High Yield (UJB) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) have volatilities of 2.29% and 2.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UJB | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.29% | 2.36% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.76% | 8.00% | -2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.29% | 11.33% | -4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.67% | 14.38% | +0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 16.60% | +1.68% |
UJB vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UJB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
UJB vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
UJB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than NOBL's 2.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.12% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
UJB ProShares Ultra High Yield | 3.35% | 2.61% | 3.02% | 3.92% | 0.05% | 0.63% | 2.88% | 3.95% | 3.22% | 2.67% | 2.35% | 3.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UJB and NOBL have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NOBL has higher volatility (2.36%) compared to UJB (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UJB dropped -40.14% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 10-year performance, NOBL leads with 9.51% vs 6.36% for UJB. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, NOBL has performed better with a 9.51% return vs 6.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UJB.
UJB has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.12% for NOBL.
UJB is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while NOBL is Dividend. UJB tracks Markit iBoxx $ Liquid High Yield Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UJB and 0.35% for NOBL.
UJB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UJB and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer