PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDIV vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UDIV vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDIV achieves a 12.46% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, UDIV has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of 11.60%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.


UDIV

1D
-1.34%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
12.46%
6M
11.52%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
23.16%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*
11.60%

VTI

1D
-1.39%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
8.82%
6M
7.71%
1Y
24.22%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
11.90%
10Y*
15.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDIV vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
12.46%19.00%25.61%25.21%-15.00%19.66%5.54%24.60%-8.83%17.44%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
8.82%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between UDIV and VTI is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.84

The correlation between UDIV and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (all time) to 0.98 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UDIV vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UDIV
VTI

Technology

40.3%
37.0%

Financial Services

11.3%
11.3%

Communication Services

10.2%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.7%
9.7%

Healthcare

7.1%
9.0%

Industrials

5.9%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
4.3%

Real Estate

3.6%
2.3%

Energy

3.3%
3.3%

Utilities

3.1%
2.1%

Basic Materials

0.8%
1.9%

Technology

UDIV
40.3%
VTI
37.0%

Financial Services

UDIV
11.3%
VTI
11.3%

Communication Services

UDIV
10.2%
VTI
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

UDIV
8.7%
VTI
9.7%

Healthcare

UDIV
7.1%
VTI
9.0%

Industrials

UDIV
5.9%
VTI
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

UDIV
5.4%
VTI
4.3%

Real Estate

UDIV
3.6%
VTI
2.3%

Energy

UDIV
3.3%
VTI
3.3%

Utilities

UDIV
3.1%
VTI
2.1%

Basic Materials

UDIV
0.8%
VTI
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UDIV vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDIV
UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDIV vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UDIVVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.34

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

2.73

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.00

12.14

+2.86

UDIV vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDIV and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UDIV vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UDIVVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-55.45%

+20.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.44%

-8.92%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.19%

-19.30%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

-25.36%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-35.00%

-0.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-2.85%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-8.01%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

2.00%

-0.08%

Volatility

UDIV vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 4.96% and 4.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UDIVVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

4.95%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.91%

10.05%

-0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.60%

12.83%

-0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

17.51%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.30%

18.32%

-2.02%

UDIV vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDIV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UDIV vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than VTI's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UDIV
Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF
1.12%1.53%2.05%1.91%3.20%2.97%2.90%3.40%3.74%3.47%1.63%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.04%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, UDIV and VTI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UDIV has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to VTI (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDIV dropped -35.21% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.14% vs 11.60% for UDIV. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.14% return vs 11.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for UDIV.

UDIV has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 1.04% for VTI.

UDIV is categorized as Dividend, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for UDIV and 0.03% for VTI.

UDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UDIV and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer