UDIV vs. RBIL

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

UDIV (Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UDIV is a Dividend fund tracking the Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UDIV returned 26.51% vs 4.20% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. UDIV charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.

Performance

UDIV vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDIV achieves a 15.14% return, which is significantly higher than RBIL's 2.66% return.

UDIV

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 1.68%
• 6M: 13.11%
• YTD: 15.14%
• 1Y: 26.51%
• 3Y*: 23.21%
• 5Y*: 14.28%
• 10Y*: 12.00%

RBIL

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.08%
• 6M: 2.48%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 1Y: 4.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UDIV vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	15.14%	15.72%
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	2.66%	2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between UDIV and RBIL is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025	-0.18

Return for Risk

UDIV vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDIV

UDIV Risk / Return Rank: 80
UDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
UDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
UDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 80
UDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
UDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

RBIL

RBIL Risk / Return Rank: 97
RBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 98
RBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
RBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDIV vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UDIV	RBIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	4.54	-2.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.83	7.04	-4.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	2.20	-0.83
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.11	7.57	-4.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.19	32.59	-19.40

UDIV vs. RBIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the RBIL Sharpe Ratio of 4.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDIV and RBIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UDIV vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDIV drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDIV and RBIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	UDIV	RBIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-0.56%	-34.65%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.44%	-0.56%	-7.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-0.17%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-0.08%	-4.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	0.13%	+1.86%

Volatility

UDIV vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison

Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF (UDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.33%. This indicates that UDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UDIV	RBIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.27%	0.33%	+3.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.99%	0.86%	+9.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.58%	0.94%	+11.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.62%	1.06%	+14.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.17%	1.06%	+15.11%

UDIV vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

UDIV has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UDIV vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison

UDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than RBIL's 4.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF	4.37%	3.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UDIV Franklin U.S. Core Dividend Tilt Index ETF	1.47%	1.53%	2.05%	1.91%	3.20%	2.97%	2.90%	3.40%	3.74%	3.47%	1.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UDIV and RBIL in my portfolio?

UDIV and RBIL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UDIV or RBIL?

UDIV has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to RBIL (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UDIV dropped -35.21% vs RBIL's -0.56%.

Which ETF is better, UDIV or RBIL?

On 1-year performance, UDIV leads with 26.51% vs 4.20% for RBIL. On fees, UDIV is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UDIV or RBIL?

Over the 1-year period, UDIV has performed better with a 26.51% return vs 4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UDIV or RBIL?

UDIV is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for RBIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UDIV or RBIL?

RBIL has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 1.47% for UDIV.

What is the main difference between UDIV and RBIL?

UDIV is categorized as Dividend, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. UDIV tracks Linked Morningstar US Dividend Enhanced Select Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for UDIV and 0.17% for RBIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.54 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.