PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UCAGX vs. USAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UCAGX vs. USAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund (UCAGX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCAGX achieves a 10.24% return, which is significantly higher than USAGX's -1.56% return. Over the past 10 years, UCAGX has underperformed USAGX with an annualized return of 9.28%, while USAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.


UCAGX

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.90%
YTD
10.24%
6M
10.82%
1Y
24.45%
3Y*
16.36%
5Y*
8.44%
10Y*
9.28%

USAGX

1D
-2.39%
1M
-0.73%
YTD
-1.56%
6M
4.39%
1Y
57.01%
3Y*
39.62%
5Y*
17.43%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCAGX vs. USAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UCAGX
USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund
10.24%19.22%10.43%14.37%-13.55%16.23%9.48%19.96%-9.34%17.91%
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
-1.56%156.06%10.76%6.73%-11.80%-10.14%25.85%42.97%-12.26%9.65%

Correlation

The correlation between UCAGX and USAGX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2012

0.31

The correlation between UCAGX and USAGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UCAGX vs. USAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UCAGX
UCAGX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
UCAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
UCAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

USAGX
USAGX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
USAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
USAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
USAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
USAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCAGX vs. USAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund (UCAGX) and USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UCAGXUSAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

1.91

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.67

4.90

+8.77

UCAGX vs. USAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCAGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the USAGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCAGX and USAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UCAGXUSAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

1.35

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.53

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.40

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.18

+0.45

Drawdowns

UCAGX vs. USAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCAGX drawdown since its inception was -29.07%, smaller than the maximum USAGX drawdown of -80.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCAGX and USAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UCAGXUSAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.07%

-80.89%

+51.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.02%

-30.12%

+22.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.61%

-30.12%

+13.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-45.72%

+20.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.07%

-51.03%

+21.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-26.33%

+25.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-43.08%

+38.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

11.72%

-9.90%

Volatility

UCAGX vs. USAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund (UCAGX) is 3.33%, while USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund (USAGX) has a volatility of 14.31%. This indicates that UCAGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UCAGXUSAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.33%

14.31%

-10.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

35.35%

-26.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.73%

42.70%

-31.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

32.86%

-18.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.17%

32.68%

-18.51%

UCAGX vs. USAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCAGX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than USAGX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

UCAGX vs. USAGX - Dividend Comparison

UCAGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.02%, more than USAGX's 0.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UCAGX
USAA Cornerstone Aggressive Fund
10.02%11.04%8.14%1.96%4.79%8.52%1.89%2.03%5.99%6.74%1.48%2.20%
USAGX
USAA Precious Metals and Minerals Fund
0.24%0.24%0.00%2.45%0.95%0.84%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.20%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UCAGX and USAGX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USAGX has higher volatility (14.31%) compared to UCAGX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCAGX dropped -29.07% vs USAGX's -80.89%.

UCAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCAGX and USAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer