PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBCP vs. WM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UBCP vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United Bancorp, Inc. (UBCP) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBCP achieves a 12.88% return, which is significantly higher than WM's 0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, UBCP has underperformed WM with an annualized return of 10.34%, while WM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.36% annualized return.


UBCP

1D
-1.08%
1M
1.99%
YTD
12.88%
6M
16.83%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
10.34%

WM

1D
0.30%
1M
0.26%
YTD
0.71%
6M
2.63%
1Y
-5.72%
3Y*
12.33%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*
15.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBCP vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBCP
United Bancorp, Inc.
12.88%17.96%8.37%-6.95%-7.37%32.06%-3.73%31.06%-10.12%1.89%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
0.71%10.50%14.28%16.20%-4.49%43.82%5.46%30.45%5.32%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between UBCP and WM is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UBCP:

$85.93M

WM:

$88.75B

EPS

UBCP:

$1.40

WM:

$6.91

PE Ratio

UBCP:

11.18

WM:

31.76

PS Ratio

UBCP:

1.82

WM:

3.49

PB Ratio

UBCP:

1.29

WM:

8.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

UBCP:

$47.82M

WM:

$25.41B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UBCP:

$32.28M

WM:

$5.61B

EBITDA (TTM)

UBCP:

$8.59M

WM:

$6.96B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBCP vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBCP
UBCP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
UBCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBCP Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
UBCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBCP Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

WM
WM Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBCP vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Bancorp, Inc. (UBCP) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBCPWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.96

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.39

-0.36

+1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.21

-0.79

+4.01

UBCP vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBCP Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBCP and WM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBCP vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBCP drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, smaller than the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBCP and WM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBCPWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.81%

-77.85%

+10.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-16.70%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.14%

-18.14%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.00%

-18.14%

-29.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

-30.07%

-17.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.00%

-10.24%

+3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.31%

-17.69%

-5.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.01%

7.58%

-0.57%

Volatility

UBCP vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

United Bancorp, Inc. (UBCP) has a higher volatility of 13.25% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 6.13%. This indicates that UBCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBCPWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.25%

6.13%

+7.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.46%

14.08%

+12.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.23%

19.03%

+15.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.71%

18.62%

+18.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.28%

19.54%

+15.74%

Dividends

UBCP vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

UBCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.01%, more than WM's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UBCP
United Bancorp, Inc.
6.01%6.41%6.58%6.35%5.26%4.11%4.32%3.81%4.55%3.47%3.48%4.38%
WM
Waste Management, Inc.
1.61%1.50%1.49%1.56%1.66%1.38%1.85%1.80%2.09%1.97%2.31%2.89%

Financials

UBCP vs. WM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Bancorp, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
11.44M
6.23B
(UBCP) Total Revenue
(WM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UBCP vs. WM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between United Bancorp, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
69.1%
0
Portfolio components
UBCP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.91M and revenue of 11.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.

WM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 6.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UBCP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 11.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

WM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.11B and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.

UBCP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 1.91M and revenue of 11.44M, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

WM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 723.00M and revenue of 6.23B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UBCP and WM have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBCP has higher volatility (13.25%) compared to WM (6.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBCP dropped -67.81% vs WM's -77.85%.

UBCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBCP and WM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer