PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBCP vs. DBMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBCP vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United Bancorp, Inc. (UBCP) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBCP achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 11.19% return.


UBCP

1D
0.96%
1M
-6.33%
6M
13.70%
YTD
10.13%
1Y
15.48%
3Y*
16.39%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*
9.85%
ALL TIME*
5.91%

DBMF

1D
0.26%
1M
1.95%
6M
6.88%
YTD
11.19%
1Y
28.45%
3Y*
9.09%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$63.53M$54.84M$51.08M
$50.39K$115.91K$138.22K

UBCP vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UBCP
United Bancorp, Inc.
10.13%17.96%8.37%-6.95%-7.37%32.06%-3.73%30.75%
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
11.19%13.85%7.24%-8.94%21.61%11.49%1.80%10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between UBCP and DBMF is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBCP vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UBCP
UBCP Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
UBCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBCP Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
UBCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBCP Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

DBMF
DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UBCP vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Bancorp, Inc. (UBCP) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBCPDBMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.44

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.95

4.54

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.14

15.42

-13.28

UBCP vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBCP Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBCP and DBMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBCP vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBCP drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBCP and DBMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBCPDBMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.81%

-20.39%

-47.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-6.10%

-10.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.14%

-15.60%

-8.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.00%

-20.39%

-27.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.26%

-1.81%

-7.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.24%

-6.48%

-16.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.21%

1.79%

+5.42%

Volatility

UBCP vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

United Bancorp, Inc. (UBCP) has a higher volatility of 11.86% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.31%. This indicates that UBCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBCPDBMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.86%

2.31%

+9.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.89%

9.81%

+18.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.90%

12.68%

+21.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.94%

12.44%

+24.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.45%

12.36%

+23.09%

Dividends

UBCP vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

UBCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, more than DBMF's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBMF
iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
5.11%5.91%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBCP
United Bancorp, Inc.
6.16%6.41%6.58%6.35%5.26%4.11%4.32%3.81%4.55%3.47%3.48%4.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBCP and DBMF have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UBCP has higher volatility (11.86%) compared to DBMF (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBCP dropped -67.81% vs DBMF's -20.39%.

DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBCP and DBMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer