PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBCP vs. NVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UBCP vs. NVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United Bancorp, Inc. (UBCP) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBCP achieves a 17.43% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, UBCP has outperformed NVO with an annualized return of 10.73%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively lower 8.17% annualized return.


UBCP

1D
-0.55%
1M
6.79%
YTD
17.43%
6M
15.30%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
18.38%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
10.73%

NVO

1D
0.56%
1M
6.06%
YTD
-1.67%
6M
-2.80%
1Y
-26.15%
3Y*
-13.58%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
8.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBCP vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UBCP
United Bancorp, Inc.
17.43%17.96%8.37%-6.95%-7.37%32.06%-3.73%31.06%-10.12%1.89%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-1.67%-39.22%-15.93%54.84%22.66%63.52%23.33%28.70%-12.98%52.92%

Correlation

The correlation between UBCP and NVO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995

0.00

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UBCP:

$89.39M

NVO:

$215.05B

EPS

UBCP:

$1.39

NVO:

DKK 27.42

PE Ratio

UBCP:

11.68

NVO:

11.57

PS Ratio

UBCP:

1.90

NVO:

4.30

PB Ratio

UBCP:

1.34

NVO:

6.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

UBCP:

$47.82M

NVO:

DKK 327.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UBCP:

$32.28M

NVO:

DKK 268.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

UBCP:

$8.59M

NVO:

DKK 181.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBCP vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBCP
UBCP Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
UBCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBCP Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
UBCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBCP Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NVO
NVO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBCP vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United Bancorp, Inc. (UBCP) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBCPNVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.94

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

-0.53

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.73

-0.84

+3.57

UBCP vs. NVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBCP Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the NVO Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBCP and NVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBCP vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBCP drawdown since its inception was -67.81%, smaller than the maximum NVO drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBCP and NVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBCPNVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.81%

-74.70%

+6.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.23%

-49.17%

+32.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.14%

-74.70%

+50.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.00%

-74.70%

+26.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.00%

-74.70%

+26.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.25%

-64.87%

+61.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.28%

-17.83%

-5.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.08%

31.10%

-24.02%

Volatility

UBCP vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for United Bancorp, Inc. (UBCP) is 9.29%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that UBCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBCPNVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

11.68%

-2.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.43%

37.71%

-11.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.00%

51.65%

-18.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.74%

38.48%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.32%

32.57%

+2.75%

Dividends

UBCP vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison

UBCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, more than NVO's 3.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
3.73%3.31%1.68%1.00%1.20%1.35%1.87%2.14%1.45%1.52%2.87%0.92%
UBCP
United Bancorp, Inc.
5.78%6.41%6.58%6.35%5.26%4.11%4.32%3.81%4.55%3.47%3.48%4.38%

Financials

UBCP vs. NVO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United Bancorp, Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
11.44M
96.82B
(UBCP) Total Revenue
(NVO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UBCP values in USD, NVO values in DKK

UBCP vs. NVO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between United Bancorp, Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

65.0%70.0%75.0%80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
69.1%
86.0%
Portfolio components
UBCP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Bancorp, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.91M and revenue of 11.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.1%.

NVO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a gross profit of 83.23B and revenue of 96.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.0%.

UBCP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Bancorp, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.75M and revenue of 11.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.

NVO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported an operating income of 59.62B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.

UBCP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, United Bancorp, Inc. reported a net income of 1.91M and revenue of 11.44M, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

NVO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a net income of 48.56B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UBCP and NVO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVO has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to UBCP (9.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBCP dropped -67.81% vs NVO's -74.70%.

UBCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBCP and NVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer