PortfoliosLab logo
DBMF vs. KMLM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DBMF and KMLM is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

DBMF vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
31.69%
21.21%
DBMF
KMLM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DBMF:

-1.07

KMLM:

-1.32

Sortino Ratio

DBMF:

-1.36

KMLM:

-1.77

Omega Ratio

DBMF:

0.83

KMLM:

0.80

Calmar Ratio

DBMF:

-0.66

KMLM:

-0.49

Martin Ratio

DBMF:

-1.16

KMLM:

-1.54

Ulcer Index

DBMF:

9.39%

KMLM:

9.26%

Daily Std Dev

DBMF:

10.22%

KMLM:

10.76%

Max Drawdown

DBMF:

-20.39%

KMLM:

-29.10%

Current Drawdown

DBMF:

-14.95%

KMLM:

-28.72%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's -6.76% return.


DBMF

YTD

-3.41%

1M

-0.87%

6M

-3.15%

1Y

-10.50%

5Y*

5.01%

10Y*

N/A

KMLM

YTD

-6.76%

1M

-3.57%

6M

-6.21%

1Y

-14.65%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBMF vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for KMLM: current value is 0.90%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
KMLM: 0.90%
Expense ratio chart for DBMF: current value is 0.85%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
DBMF: 0.85%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DBMF vs. KMLM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DBMF is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DBMF is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DBMF is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DBMF is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DBMF is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

KMLM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KMLM is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KMLM is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KMLM is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KMLM is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KMLM is 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KMLM is 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DBMF vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for DBMF, currently valued at -1.07, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
DBMF: -1.07
KMLM: -1.32
The chart of Sortino ratio for DBMF, currently valued at -1.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
DBMF: -1.36
KMLM: -1.77
The chart of Omega ratio for DBMF, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
DBMF: 0.83
KMLM: 0.80
The chart of Calmar ratio for DBMF, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
DBMF: -0.66
KMLM: -0.49
The chart of Martin ratio for DBMF, currently valued at -1.16, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
DBMF: -1.16
KMLM: -1.54

The current DBMF Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is comparable to the KMLM Sharpe Ratio of -1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMF and KMLM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.000.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.07
-1.32
DBMF
KMLM

Dividends

DBMF vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison

DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than KMLM's 0.88% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
6.08%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
0.88%0.82%0.00%8.12%6.94%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DBMF vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, smaller than the maximum KMLM drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and KMLM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-14.95%
-28.72%
DBMF
KMLM

Volatility

DBMF vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison

iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 2.78%. This indicates that DBMF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.07%
2.78%
DBMF
KMLM