PortfoliosLab logo
DBMF vs. CTA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between DBMF and CTA is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.0

Performance

DBMF vs. CTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
4.08%
32.70%
DBMF
CTA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

DBMF:

-1.07

CTA:

0.46

Sortino Ratio

DBMF:

-1.36

CTA:

0.75

Omega Ratio

DBMF:

0.83

CTA:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

DBMF:

-0.66

CTA:

0.66

Martin Ratio

DBMF:

-1.16

CTA:

1.25

Ulcer Index

DBMF:

9.39%

CTA:

4.59%

Daily Std Dev

DBMF:

10.22%

CTA:

12.56%

Max Drawdown

DBMF:

-20.39%

CTA:

-18.07%

Current Drawdown

DBMF:

-14.95%

CTA:

-7.87%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBMF achieves a -3.41% return, which is significantly lower than CTA's -0.20% return.


DBMF

YTD

-3.41%

1M

-0.87%

6M

-3.15%

1Y

-10.50%

5Y*

5.01%

10Y*

N/A

CTA

YTD

-0.20%

1M

-6.89%

6M

6.80%

1Y

6.57%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBMF vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBMF has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for DBMF: current value is 0.85%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
DBMF: 0.85%
Expense ratio chart for CTA: current value is 0.78%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
CTA: 0.78%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

DBMF vs. CTA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBMF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DBMF is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DBMF is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DBMF is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DBMF is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DBMF is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DBMF is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CTA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CTA is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CTA is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CTA is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CTA is 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CTA is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CTA is 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

DBMF vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for DBMF, currently valued at -1.07, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
DBMF: -1.07
CTA: 0.46
The chart of Sortino ratio for DBMF, currently valued at -1.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
DBMF: -1.36
CTA: 0.75
The chart of Omega ratio for DBMF, currently valued at 0.83, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
DBMF: 0.83
CTA: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for DBMF, currently valued at -0.66, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
DBMF: -0.66
CTA: 0.66
The chart of Martin ratio for DBMF, currently valued at -1.16, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
DBMF: -1.16
CTA: 1.25

The current DBMF Sharpe Ratio is -1.07, which is lower than the CTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBMF and CTA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.07
0.46
DBMF
CTA

Dividends

DBMF vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison

DBMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than CTA's 4.72% yield.


TTM202420232022202120202019
DBMF
iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF
6.08%5.75%2.91%7.72%10.38%0.86%9.35%
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
4.72%4.80%7.78%6.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

DBMF vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBMF drawdown since its inception was -20.39%, which is greater than CTA's maximum drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBMF and CTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-14.95%
-7.87%
DBMF
CTA

Volatility

DBMF vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) is 3.07%, while Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that DBMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.50%2.00%2.50%3.00%3.50%4.00%4.50%5.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.07%
4.47%
DBMF
CTA