TTAC vs. GQGU
TTAC (TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. TTAC charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
TTAC vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 2.89% return.
TTAC
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- 3.86%
- YTD
- 18.93%
- 6M
- 16.87%
- 1Y
- 24.51%
- 3Y*
- 19.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.94%
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 2.89%
- 6M
- 3.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TTAC vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 18.93% | 3.80% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 2.89% | -1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between TTAC and GQGU is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TTAC vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
TTAC
GQGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TTAC vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TTAC | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.98 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TTAC vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TTAC | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.95% | -8.41% | -26.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -7.97% | +7.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -2.69% | -2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | — | — |
Volatility
TTAC vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TTAC | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.12% | 10.38% | +5.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 10.38% | +6.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.75% | 10.38% | +8.37% |
TTAC vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
TTAC vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than GQGU's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TTAC TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF | 0.53% | 0.62% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.36% | 9.63% | 0.41% | 0.72% | 0.62% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TTAC and GQGU have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GQGU is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GQGU is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TTAC.
GQGU has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.53% for TTAC.
They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TTAC and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for TTAC and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer