PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
TTAC vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

TTAC vs. BDGS

Last updated May 10, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).

TTAC and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TTAC is an actively managed fund by TrimTabs. It was launched on Sep 28, 2016. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TTAC or BDGS.

Correlation

The correlation between TTAC and BDGS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

TTAC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period

TTAC

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

0.46%

1M

0.47%

6M

1.87%

1Y

15.71%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TTAC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.

BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TTAC vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TTAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TTAC is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TTAC is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TTAC is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TTAC is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TTAC is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TTAC is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TTAC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Loading data...

Dividends

TTAC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

TTAC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.

TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF		0.55%0.67%0.94%0.00%0.85%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%0.19%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF		1.80%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TTAC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

Loading data...

Volatility

TTAC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Loading data...