PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TTAC vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TTAC and BDGS is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

TTAC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
10.36%
9.20%
TTAC
BDGS

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


TTAC

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.62%

1M

0.22%

6M

9.20%

1Y

20.60%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TTAC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
Expense ratio chart for BDGS: current value at 0.85% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.85%
Expense ratio chart for TTAC: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TTAC vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TTAC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TTAC is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TTAC is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TTAC is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TTAC is 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TTAC is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TTAC is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9898
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TTAC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TTAC, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market0.002.004.001.513.97
The chart of Sortino ratio for TTAC, currently valued at 2.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.167.04
The chart of Omega ratio for TTAC, currently valued at 1.29, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.292.23
The chart of Calmar ratio for TTAC, currently valued at 2.38, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.388.70
The chart of Martin ratio for TTAC, currently valued at 7.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.007.7538.12
TTAC
BDGS


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.51
3.97
TTAC
BDGS

Dividends

TTAC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

TTAC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.


TTM202420232022202120202019201820172016
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
0.67%0.67%0.94%0.00%0.85%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%0.19%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.76%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TTAC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison


-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-2.61%
-0.09%
TTAC
BDGS

Volatility

TTAC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) is 0.00%, while Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) has a volatility of 0.62%. This indicates that TTAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February0
0.62%
TTAC
BDGS
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab