PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TTAC vs. COWG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


TTACCOWG
YTD Return21.96%38.15%
1Y Return32.20%51.28%
Sharpe Ratio2.583.01
Sortino Ratio3.543.91
Omega Ratio1.451.52
Calmar Ratio4.344.59
Martin Ratio16.0519.40
Ulcer Index2.00%2.63%
Daily Std Dev12.45%16.96%
Max Drawdown-34.95%-11.11%
Current Drawdown-0.64%-0.12%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between TTAC and COWG is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

TTAC vs. COWG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TTAC achieves a 21.96% return, which is significantly lower than COWG's 38.15% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.39%
27.17%
TTAC
COWG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TTAC vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TTAC has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.


TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
Expense ratio chart for TTAC: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%
Expense ratio chart for COWG: current value at 0.49% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.49%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

TTAC vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TTAC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TTAC, currently valued at 2.58, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.58
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TTAC, currently valued at 3.54, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.54
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TTAC, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.45
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TTAC, currently valued at 4.34, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TTAC, currently valued at 16.05, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0016.05
COWG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for COWG, currently valued at 3.01, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.01
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for COWG, currently valued at 3.91, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.91
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for COWG, currently valued at 1.52, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.52
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for COWG, currently valued at 4.59, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for COWG, currently valued at 19.40, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0019.40

TTAC vs. COWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TTAC Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is comparable to the COWG Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TTAC and COWG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.58
3.01
TTAC
COWG

Dividends

TTAC vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison

TTAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than COWG's 0.37% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016
TTAC
TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF
0.72%0.94%1.36%9.63%0.41%0.72%0.62%0.40%0.19%
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.37%0.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TTAC vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TTAC drawdown since its inception was -34.95%, which is greater than COWG's maximum drawdown of -11.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TTAC and COWG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.64%
-0.12%
TTAC
COWG

Volatility

TTAC vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs US Free Cash Flow Quality ETF (TTAC) is 3.50%, while Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that TTAC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.50%
5.10%
TTAC
COWG