TSLT vs. FNGU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU).

TSLT and FNGU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TSLT is an actively managed fund by T-Rex. It was launched on Oct 18, 2023. FNGU is a passively managed fund by Bank of Montreal that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG (TR) (300%). It was launched on Jan 22, 2018.

Performance

TSLT vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TSLT vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF	-36.32%	-2.34%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN	-38.12%	4.24%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TSLT having a -36.32% return and FNGU slightly lower at -38.12%.

TSLT

• 1D: 9.18%
• 1M: -16.84%
• YTD: -36.32%
• 6M: -40.73%
• 1Y: 30.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGU

• 1D: 13.84%
• 1M: -15.01%
• YTD: -38.12%
• 6M: -46.40%
• 1Y: 17.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLT vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FNGU's 0.95% expense ratio.

TSLT

T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF

FNGU

MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN

Return for Risk

TSLT vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLT

TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 30
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 20

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 24
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLT vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLT	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	0.23	+0.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.21	0.91	+0.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.12	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	0.27	+0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.06	0.71	+0.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLT vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is comparable to the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLT and FNGU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLT	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28	0.23	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.06	-0.41	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between TSLT and FNGU is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

TSLT vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSLT nor FNGU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

TSLT vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -60.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLT	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.16%	-60.84%	-22.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.40%	-59.55%	+8.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.07%	-53.95%	-15.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.13%	-21.77%	-27.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.16%	22.28%	+1.88%

Volatility

TSLT vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and MicroSectors FANG+™ Index 3X Leveraged ETN (FNGU) have volatilities of 22.37% and 23.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLT	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	22.37%	23.48%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.16%	44.72%	+14.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	110.56%	77.61%	+32.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	119.13%	80.84%	+38.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	119.13%	80.84%	+38.29%