TSLT vs. TSLR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) and TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSLT returned 4.97% vs 10.10% for TSLR. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TSLT charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSLR.

Performance

TSLT vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLT achieves a -21.75% return, which is significantly lower than TSLR's -19.92% return.

TSLT

• 1D: 3.83%
• 1M: 14.40%
• YTD: -21.75%
• 6M: -16.23%
• 1Y: 4.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSLR

• 1D: 3.94%
• 1M: 15.15%
• YTD: -19.92%
• 6M: -13.78%
• 1Y: 10.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLT vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF	-21.75%	-29.49%	54.17%	20.11%
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF	-19.92%	-25.97%	67.57%	18.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLT and TSLR is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023	1.00

The correlation between TSLT and TSLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

TSLT vs. TSLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSLT	TSLR
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	66.6%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TSLT vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLT

TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 12
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

TSLR

TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 13
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLT vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TSLT	TSLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.05	0.11	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.74	0.82	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.10	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.06	0.15	-0.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.12	0.30	-0.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TSLT vs. TSLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the TSLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLT and TSLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TSLT	TSLR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05	0.11	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.01	0.00	0.00

Drawdowns

TSLT vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and TSLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLT	TSLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.16%	-82.80%	-0.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.08%	-54.37%	-0.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.99%	-59.02%	-2.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.22%	-50.23%	+0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.98%	26.37%	+0.61%

Volatility

TSLT vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) have volatilities of 24.38% and 24.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLT	TSLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.38%	24.39%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.35%	54.65%	-0.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	92.42%	92.77%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	117.14%	115.63%	+1.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	117.14%	115.63%	+1.51%

TSLT vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLR's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLT vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither TSLT nor TSLR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLT and TSLR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, TSLT and TSLR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TSLT or TSLR?

TSLR has higher volatility (24.39%) compared to TSLT (24.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLT dropped -83.16% vs TSLR's -82.80%.

Which ETF is better, TSLT or TSLR?

On 1-year performance, TSLR leads with 10.10% vs 4.97% for TSLT. On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLT or TSLR?

Over the 1-year period, TSLR has performed better with a 10.10% return vs 4.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLT or TSLR?

TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLT or TSLR?

TSLT and TSLR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between TSLT and TSLR?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLT and 1.50% for TSLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.