TSLT vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLT is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. TSLT is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. Over the past year, TSLT returned -15.30% vs 138.23% for SMH. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TSLT charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

TSLT vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TSLT achieves a -38.04% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return.

TSLT

• 1D: -11.45%
• 1M: -22.15%
• YTD: -38.04%
• 6M: -47.16%
• 1Y: -15.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMH

• 1D: -7.01%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 72.73%
• 6M: 71.29%
• 1Y: 138.23%
• 3Y*: 62.28%
• 5Y*: 38.18%
• 10Y*: 37.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TSLT vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF	-38.04%	-29.49%	54.17%	13.02%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	72.73%	49.17%	39.10%	21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between TSLT and SMH is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023	0.47

TSLT vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TSLT	SMH
Consumer Cyclical	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TSLT vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TSLT

TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 8
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 10
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 6

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TSLT vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TSLT	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	3.99	-4.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.35	4.05	-3.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.58	-0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.28	9.31	-9.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.55	33.88	-34.43

TSLT vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TSLT Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TSLT and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TSLT vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, roughly equal to the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TSLT	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.16%	-84.96%	+1.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-55.08%	-14.93%	-40.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-35.74%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-69.90%	-7.01%	-62.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.62%	-41.01%	-9.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.13%	4.10%	+24.03%

Volatility

TSLT vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) has a higher volatility of 28.45% compared to VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 19.08%. This indicates that TSLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TSLT	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.45%	19.08%	+9.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.51%	29.18%	+27.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	88.95%	34.87%	+54.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	116.87%	35.83%	+81.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	116.87%	32.97%	+83.90%

TSLT vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TSLT has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

TSLT vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

TSLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TSLT and SMH in my portfolio?

TSLT and SMH have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TSLT or SMH?

TSLT has higher volatility (28.45%) compared to SMH (19.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLT dropped -83.16% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, TSLT or SMH?

On 1-year performance, SMH leads with 138.23% vs -15.30% for TSLT. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SMH has been the lower-risk option at 19.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TSLT or SMH?

Over the 1-year period, SMH has performed better with a 138.23% return vs -15.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TSLT or SMH?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TSLT or SMH?

SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for TSLT.

What is the main difference between TSLT and SMH?

TSLT is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TSLT and 0.35% for SMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.