TSLT vs. NVDA
TSLT (T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past year, TSLT returned 4.97% vs 62.23% for NVDA. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSLT vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLT achieves a -21.75% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 19.48% return.
TSLT
- 1D
- 3.83%
- 1M
- 14.40%
- YTD
- -21.75%
- 6M
- -16.23%
- 1Y
- 4.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDA
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 12.28%
- YTD
- 19.48%
- 6M
- 22.81%
- 1Y
- 62.23%
- 3Y*
- 78.33%
- 5Y*
- 67.45%
- 10Y*
- 69.46%
TSLT vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | -21.75% | -29.49% | 54.17% | 20.11% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 19.48% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 17.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLT and NVDA is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLT vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
TSLT
NVDA
TSLT vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TSLT | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.05 | 1.84 | -1.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 2.47 | -1.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.30 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.06 | 3.21 | -3.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.12 | 7.92 | -7.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TSLT | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 1.84 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.63 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
TSLT vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLT drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLT and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLT | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -89.72% | +6.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -55.08% | -20.21% | -34.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.99% | -5.48% | -56.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.22% | -36.21% | -14.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.98% | 8.20% | +18.78% |
Volatility
TSLT vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT) has a higher volatility of 24.38% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 11.79%. This indicates that TSLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLT | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.38% | 11.79% | +12.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.35% | 25.29% | +29.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 92.42% | 34.03% | +58.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 117.14% | 51.66% | +65.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 117.14% | 49.80% | +67.34% |
Dividends
TSLT vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
TSLT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
TSLT T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLT and NVDA have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLT has higher volatility (24.38%) compared to NVDA (11.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSLT dropped -83.16% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSLT and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer