TSLI vs. NOBL
TSLI (ProShares Ultra TSLA) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TSLI is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by ProShares, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. TSLI is actively managed, while NOBL is passively managed. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TSLI vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSLI achieves a -27.63% return, which is significantly lower than NOBL's 9.42% return.
TSLI
- 1D
- 16.30%
- 1M
- -13.97%
- YTD
- -27.63%
- 6M
- -31.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 9.42%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- 8.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
TSLI vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSLI ProShares Ultra TSLA | -27.63% | 48.21% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 9.42% | 1.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSLI and NOBL is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSLI vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
TSLI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NOBL
TSLI vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra TSLA (TSLI) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSLI | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.22 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSLI vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSLI drawdown since its inception was -54.83%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSLI and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSLI | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.83% | -35.43% | -19.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.83% | -0.62% | -39.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.12% | -3.48% | -22.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.59% | — |
Volatility
TSLI vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSLI | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 88.44% | 11.50% | +76.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 88.44% | 14.39% | +74.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 88.44% | 16.57% | +71.87% |
Dividends
TSLI vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
TSLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.72%, more than NOBL's 2.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.07% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
TSLI ProShares Ultra TSLA | 9.72% | 6.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TSLI and NOBL have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLI has the higher dividend yield at 9.72%, compared with 2.07% for NOBL.
TSLI is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NOBL is Dividend.
Find the right allocation for TSLI and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer