PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRTN-PB vs. LINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRTN-PB vs. LINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PB) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRTN-PB achieves a 4.46% return, which is significantly lower than LINC's 104.27% return.


TRTN-PB

1D
0.14%
1M
0.86%
YTD
4.46%
6M
3.89%
1Y
11.12%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*

LINC

1D
1.86%
1M
1.92%
YTD
104.27%
6M
103.26%
1Y
119.44%
3Y*
99.10%
5Y*
44.87%
10Y*
42.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRTN-PB vs. LINC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRTN-PB
Triton International Ltd
4.46%8.50%9.14%8.21%-1.49%10.25%6.73%13.02%
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
104.27%52.65%57.57%73.40%-22.49%14.92%140.74%2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between TRTN-PB and LINC is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2019

0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRTN-PB:

$2.56B

LINC:

$1.55B

EPS

TRTN-PB:

$4.65

LINC:

$0.72

PE Ratio

TRTN-PB:

5.45

LINC:

68.89

PS Ratio

TRTN-PB:

1.90

LINC:

2.83

PB Ratio

TRTN-PB:

1.61

LINC:

7.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRTN-PB:

$1.35B

LINC:

$544.69M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRTN-PB:

$872.64M

LINC:

$242.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

TRTN-PB:

$1.11B

LINC:

$49.04M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRTN-PB vs. LINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRTN-PB
TRTN-PB Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
TRTN-PB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRTN-PB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRTN-PB Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
TRTN-PB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRTN-PB Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

LINC
LINC Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
LINC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
LINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
LINC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRTN-PB vs. LINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PB) and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRTN-PBLINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.41

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.60

4.39

+2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.15

11.86

+8.28

TRTN-PB vs. LINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRTN-PB Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the LINC Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRTN-PB and LINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRTN-PB vs. LINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRTN-PB drawdown since its inception was -60.61%, smaller than the maximum LINC drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRTN-PB and LINC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRTN-PBLINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.61%

-99.11%

+38.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.69%

-27.35%

+25.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.41%

-27.35%

+17.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.40%

-41.96%

+29.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.17%

+5.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.04%

-59.00%

+55.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

10.11%

-9.56%

Volatility

TRTN-PB vs. LINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Triton International Ltd (TRTN-PB) is 1.13%, while Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) has a volatility of 13.01%. This indicates that TRTN-PB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRTN-PBLINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.13%

13.01%

-11.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.47%

32.10%

-28.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.21%

46.96%

-40.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.96%

44.15%

-32.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.28%

57.04%

-32.76%

Dividends

TRTN-PB vs. LINC - Dividend Comparison

TRTN-PB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.90%, while LINC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
LINC
Lincoln Educational Services Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRTN-PB
Triton International Ltd
7.90%7.93%7.95%8.02%8.00%7.30%7.49%3.51%

Financials

TRTN-PB vs. LINC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Triton International Ltd and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M20222023202420252026
331.25M
143.96M
(TRTN-PB) Total Revenue
(LINC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

TRTN-PB vs. LINC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Triton International Ltd and Lincoln Educational Services Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
62.5%
0
Portfolio components
TRTN-PB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triton International Ltd reported a gross profit of 206.99M and revenue of 331.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.5%.

LINC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 143.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TRTN-PB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triton International Ltd reported an operating income of 180.12M and revenue of 331.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 54.4%.

LINC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported an operating income of 6.41M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.

TRTN-PB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Triton International Ltd reported a net income of 106.44M and revenue of 331.25M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.

LINC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation reported a net income of 4.36M and revenue of 143.96M, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


TRTN-PB and LINC have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LINC has higher volatility (13.01%) compared to TRTN-PB (1.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRTN-PB dropped -60.61% vs LINC's -99.11%.

LINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRTN-PB and LINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer