TRND vs. MNZL
TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) and MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - TRND tracks the Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index while MNZL tracks the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRND charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MNZL.
Performance
TRND vs. MNZL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than MNZL's 16.79% return.
TRND
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 19.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.46%
- 5Y*
- 5.85%
- 10Y*
- —
MNZL
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 16.79%
- 6M
- 15.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRND vs. MNZL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 8.99% | 3.49% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 16.79% | 3.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRND and MNZL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRND vs. MNZL — Risk / Return Rank
TRND
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TRND vs. MNZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRND | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.86 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRND vs. MNZL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than MNZL's maximum drawdown of -9.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and MNZL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRND | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -9.66% | -8.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.53% | -2.21% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -1.85% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | — | — |
Volatility
TRND vs. MNZL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRND | MNZL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 16.96% | -4.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.92% | 16.96% | -7.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.27% | 16.96% | -5.69% |
TRND vs. MNZL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than MNZL's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRND vs. MNZL - Dividend Comparison
TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than MNZL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 2.13% | 2.32% | 2.31% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 0.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, TRND and MNZL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.
TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
TRND tracks Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index, while MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Manzil. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.40% for MNZL.
Find the right allocation for TRND and MNZL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer