MNZL vs. AMIGX
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and AMIGX (Amana Growth Fund) are both funds - MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while AMIGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Amana. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for AMIGX.
Performance
MNZL vs. AMIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MNZL having a 15.56% return and AMIGX slightly lower at 15.24%.
MNZL
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 15.56%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMIGX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 1.47%
- YTD
- 15.24%
- 6M
- 14.59%
- 1Y
- 34.05%
- 3Y*
- 20.59%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 18.13%
MNZL vs. AMIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 15.56% | 3.37% |
AMIGX Amana Growth Fund | 15.24% | 2.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and AMIGX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.89 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. AMIGX — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMIGX
MNZL vs. AMIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Amana Growth Fund (AMIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNZL | AMIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.37 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.20 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.72 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. AMIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum AMIGX drawdown of -27.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and AMIGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | AMIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -27.95% | +18.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.25% | -1.94% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -4.51% | +2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.56% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. AMIGX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | AMIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.15% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.03% | 16.92% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 18.55% | -1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 18.50% | -1.47% |
MNZL vs. AMIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than AMIGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. AMIGX - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than AMIGX's 0.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMIGX Amana Growth Fund | 0.16% | 0.19% | 4.02% | 0.82% | 3.88% | 0.74% | 5.42% | 3.37% | 3.61% | 11.11% | 13.79% | 7.61% |
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MNZL and AMIGX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and AMIGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer