MNZL vs. SPUS
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SPUS.
Performance
MNZL vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 18.40% return, which is significantly higher than SPUS's 12.83% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 3.76%
- YTD
- 18.40%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 12.83%
- 6M
- 12.41%
- 1Y
- 36.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- 16.30%
- 10Y*
- —
MNZL vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 18.40% | 3.37% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 12.83% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and SPUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPUS
MNZL vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNZL | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.42 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum SPUS drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and SPUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -30.80% | +21.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | -3.41% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -6.19% | +4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.64% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.05% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.76% | 15.08% | +1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 19.38% | -2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 21.32% | -4.56% |
MNZL vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than SPUS's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.53% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, MNZL and SPUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MNZL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MNZL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.
SPUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SPUS is S&P 500. MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.45% for SPUS.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and SPUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer