TRND vs. VT
TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRND returned 6.30%/yr vs 11.13%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRND charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
TRND vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.36% return.
TRND
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 22.25%
- 3Y*
- 11.97%
- 5Y*
- 6.30%
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 12.14%
- 1Y
- 29.57%
- 3Y*
- 20.75%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.20%
TRND vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 10.42% | 6.03% | 11.97% | 16.48% | -15.37% | 12.95% | 4.73% | 8.58% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.36% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 9.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRND and VT is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.92 |
The correlation between TRND and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
TRND vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TRND
VT
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
TRND
VT
Industrials
TRND
VT
Financial Services
TRND
VT
Consumer Cyclical
TRND
VT
Communication Services
TRND
VT
Healthcare
TRND
VT
Consumer Defensive
TRND
VT
Energy
TRND
VT
Basic Materials
TRND
VT
Real Estate
TRND
VT
Utilities
TRND
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRND vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
TRND
VT
TRND vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRND | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.40 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 3.07 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 13.35 | -1.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRND vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRND | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -50.27% | +32.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | -9.67% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.56% | -16.51% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | -26.38% | +10.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -0.77% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -7.00% | +1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 2.22% | -0.28% |
Volatility
TRND vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) is 4.71%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that TRND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRND | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 5.23% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.79% | 11.12% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.99% | 13.44% | -1.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.89% | 16.16% | -6.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.26% | 17.27% | -6.01% |
TRND vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRND vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than VT's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 2.10% | 2.32% | 2.31% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, TRND and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VT has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to TRND (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRND dropped -17.88% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 5-year performance, VT leads with 11.13% vs 6.30% for TRND. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, TRND has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VT has performed better with a 11.13% return vs 6.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.
TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 1.58% for VT.
TRND is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VT is Global Equities. TRND tracks Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.06% for VT.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRND and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer