PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRND vs. PTLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRND vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than PTLC's 2.97% return.


TRND

1D
-1.73%
1M
0.37%
YTD
8.51%
6M
7.65%
1Y
19.47%
3Y*
11.32%
5Y*
5.81%
10Y*

PTLC

1D
-1.38%
1M
-1.33%
YTD
2.97%
6M
2.00%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
13.44%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRND vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
8.51%6.03%11.97%16.48%-15.37%12.95%4.73%8.58%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
2.97%5.10%24.31%16.78%-8.62%27.90%-1.15%10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between TRND and PTLC is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019

0.88

The correlation between TRND and PTLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRND vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRND
TRND Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
TRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRND Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRND Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRND vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRNDPTLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.26

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

2.00

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.01

7.66

+2.35

TRND vs. PTLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRND Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the PTLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRND and PTLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRND vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum PTLC drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and PTLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRNDPTLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-26.63%

+8.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.00%

-8.77%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.56%

-15.17%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.21%

-15.17%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-3.15%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-5.63%

+0.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.28%

-0.33%

Volatility

TRND vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) have volatilities of 5.06% and 4.91%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRNDPTLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

4.91%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

9.19%

+0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.10%

11.98%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.92%

11.87%

-1.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.28%

13.19%

-1.91%

TRND vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRND vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison

TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than PTLC's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.03%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%
TRND
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF
2.14%2.32%2.31%2.51%1.76%0.93%0.60%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TRND and PTLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRND has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to PTLC (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRND dropped -17.88% vs PTLC's -26.63%.

On 5-year performance, PTLC leads with 9.97% vs 5.81% for TRND. On fees, PTLC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PTLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PTLC has performed better with a 9.97% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTLC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.

TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.03% for PTLC.

TRND tracks Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index, while PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.60% for PTLC.

TRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRND and PTLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer