TRND vs. FLRT
TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) and FLRT (Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index, while FLRT is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Pacific Life. TRND is passively managed, while FLRT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRND returned 5.81%/yr vs 5.95%/yr for FLRT. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRND charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for FLRT.
Performance
TRND vs. FLRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a 8.51% return, which is significantly higher than FLRT's 1.81% return.
TRND
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 8.51%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 19.47%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- —
FLRT
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- 1Y
- 5.54%
- 3Y*
- 8.54%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.90%
TRND vs. FLRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 8.51% | 6.03% | 11.97% | 16.48% | -15.37% | 12.95% | 4.73% | 8.58% |
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 1.81% | 6.24% | 9.18% | 14.59% | -2.72% | 3.18% | 2.78% | 3.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRND and FLRT is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019 | 0.26 |
The correlation between TRND and FLRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.42 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRND vs. FLRT — Risk / Return Rank
TRND
FLRT
TRND vs. FLRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRND | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.82 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 3.13 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.01 | 11.44 | -1.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRND vs. FLRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum FLRT drawdown of -20.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and FLRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRND | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -20.96% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | -1.78% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.56% | -2.87% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | -7.60% | -8.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -0.17% | -1.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -1.41% | -3.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 0.49% | +1.46% |
Volatility
TRND vs. FLRT - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF (FLRT) at 0.42%. This indicates that TRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRND | FLRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 0.42% | +4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.95% | 1.23% | +8.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.10% | 1.59% | +10.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.92% | 2.30% | +7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.28% | 6.12% | +5.16% |
TRND vs. FLRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRND vs. FLRT - Dividend Comparison
TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, less than FLRT's 6.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRT Pacific Global Senior Loan ETF | 6.81% | 6.93% | 7.93% | 8.40% | 5.81% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 4.30% | 3.95% | 3.20% | 3.38% | 3.21% |
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 2.14% | 2.32% | 2.31% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRND and FLRT have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRND has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to FLRT (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRND dropped -17.88% vs FLRT's -20.96%.
On 5-year performance, FLRT leads with 5.95% vs 5.81% for TRND. On fees, FLRT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FLRT has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLRT has performed better with a 5.95% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLRT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.
FLRT has the higher dividend yield at 6.81%, compared with 2.14% for TRND.
TRND is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FLRT is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Pacific Life. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.69% for FLRT.
FLRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRND and FLRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer