TRND vs. PTNQ
TRND (Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds from Pacer - TRND tracks the Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index while PTNQ tracks the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRND returned 6.46%/yr vs 12.12%/yr for PTNQ. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRND charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.
Performance
TRND vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRND achieves a 10.59% return, which is significantly lower than PTNQ's 14.33% return.
TRND
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 10.59%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 22.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.46%
- 10Y*
- —
PTNQ
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- 1Y
- 34.32%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
TRND vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 10.59% | 6.03% | 11.97% | 16.48% | -15.37% | 12.95% | 4.73% | 7.79% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 14.33% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -16.00% | 13.16% | 29.38% | 12.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRND and PTNQ is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between TRND and PTNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
TRND vs. PTNQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TRND
PTNQ
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
TRND
PTNQ
Industrials
TRND
PTNQ
Financial Services
TRND
PTNQ
Consumer Cyclical
TRND
PTNQ
Communication Services
TRND
PTNQ
Healthcare
TRND
PTNQ
Consumer Defensive
TRND
PTNQ
Energy
TRND
PTNQ
Basic Materials
TRND
PTNQ
Real Estate
TRND
PTNQ
Utilities
TRND
PTNQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRND vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank
TRND
PTNQ
TRND vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRND | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.01 | 2.22 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.84 | 2.90 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.38 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 3.01 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.02 | 10.24 | +1.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRND | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 2.22 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.94 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.81 | -0.15 |
Drawdowns
TRND vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRND drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRND and PTNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRND | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.88% | -28.07% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.00% | -11.76% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.56% | -14.19% | +4.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.21% | -18.47% | +2.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -5.69% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 3.46% | -1.56% |
Volatility
TRND vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF (TRND) is 3.59%, while Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that TRND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRND | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 4.64% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.96% | 11.48% | -2.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.22% | 15.57% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.71% | 12.90% | -3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.18% | 16.38% | -5.20% |
TRND vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRND has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRND vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison
TRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%, more than PTNQ's 0.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.77% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
TRND Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds ETF | 2.10% | 2.32% | 2.31% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRND and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTNQ has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to TRND (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRND dropped -17.88% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.
On 5-year performance, PTNQ leads with 12.12% vs 6.46% for TRND. On fees, PTNQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, TRND has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTNQ has performed better with a 12.12% return vs 6.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PTNQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for TRND.
TRND has the higher dividend yield at 2.10%, compared with 0.77% for PTNQ.
TRND tracks Pacer Trendpilot Fund of Funds Index, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for TRND and 0.65% for PTNQ.
PTNQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRND and PTNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer