MNZL vs. VOO
MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
MNZL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.
MNZL
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 11.20%
- YTD
- 19.44%
- 6M
- 17.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
MNZL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 19.44% | 2.90% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 3.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNZL and VOO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNZL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
MNZL
VOO
MNZL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNZL | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.06 | 0.89 | +2.17 |
Drawdowns
MNZL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNZL | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -33.99% | +24.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.70% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.75% | -3.69% | +1.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.91% | — |
Volatility
MNZL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNZL | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 11.80% | +3.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 16.81% | -1.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.71% | 18.01% | -2.30% |
MNZL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MNZL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, MNZL and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MNZL.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.
MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.03% for VOO.
Find the right allocation for MNZL and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer