MNZL vs. VOO

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MNZL (Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MNZL is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MNZL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

MNZL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.45% return.

MNZL

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 14.22%
• YTD: 16.92%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 1.25%
• 6M: 8.34%
• YTD: 10.45%
• 1Y: 21.53%
• 3Y*: 20.16%
• 5Y*: 13.01%
• 10Y*: 15.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNZL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF	16.92%	3.37%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	10.45%	3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between MNZL and VOO is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.91

Return for Risk

MNZL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNZL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 66
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNZL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MNZL	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.73	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.39	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.43	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.60	—

Drawdowns

MNZL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MNZL	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.66%	-33.99%	+24.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.90%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.53%	-1.11%	-1.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	-3.68%	+1.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MNZL	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.97%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.06%	12.53%	+4.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.06%	16.93%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.06%	18.00%	-0.94%

MNZL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

MNZL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than VOO's 1.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MNZL Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF	0.03%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.07%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MNZL and VOO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, MNZL and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, MNZL or VOO?

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MNZL or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MNZL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MNZL or VOO?

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.

What is the main difference between MNZL and VOO?

MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.03% for VOO.