PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNZL vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNZL vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNZL achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return.


MNZL

1D
0.03%
1M
11.20%
YTD
19.44%
6M
17.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNZL vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MNZL
Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF
19.44%2.90%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between MNZL and VOO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNZL vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNZL

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNZL vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MNZL vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNZLVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.06

0.89

+2.17

Drawdowns

MNZL vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNZL drawdown since its inception was -9.66%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNZL and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNZLVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-33.99%

+24.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.70%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.75%

-3.69%

+1.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

Volatility

MNZL vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNZLVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.71%

11.80%

+3.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

16.81%

-1.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.71%

18.01%

-2.30%

MNZL vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNZL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNZL vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

MNZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNZL
Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF
0.03%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, MNZL and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MNZL.

VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.03% for MNZL.

MNZL is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. MNZL tracks Russell IdealRatings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: Manzil and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for MNZL and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNZL and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer