TRI vs. THFF

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TRI (Thomson Reuters Corp) and THFF (First Financial Corporation) are both stocks. TRI operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while THFF operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, TRI returned 9.78%/yr vs 9.88%/yr for THFF. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TRI vs. THFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and First Financial Corporation (THFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRI achieves a -33.56% return, which is significantly lower than THFF's 17.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRI having a 9.78% annualized return and THFF not far ahead at 9.88%.

TRI

• 1D: -8.12%
• 1M: -7.89%
• YTD: -33.56%
• 6M: -34.28%
• 1Y: -55.27%
• 3Y*: -9.73%
• 5Y*: -0.88%
• 10Y*: 9.78%

THFF

• 1D: 1.68%
• 1M: 5.17%
• YTD: 17.16%
• 6M: 19.63%
• 1Y: 41.12%
• 3Y*: 30.93%
• 5Y*: 12.66%
• 10Y*: 9.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRI vs. THFF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp	-33.56%	-16.57%	11.14%	30.31%	-3.01%	49.18%	16.71%	51.59%	14.56%	2.68%
THFF First Financial Corporation	17.16%	36.17%	11.11%	-2.62%	4.45%	19.47%	-12.74%	16.79%	-9.41%	-9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between TRI and THFF is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2002	0.26

The correlation between TRI and THFF shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap TRI : $37.79B THFF : $826.13M
EPS TRI : $3.42 THFF : $6.80
PE Ratio TRI : 25.25 THFF : 10.23
PS Ratio TRI : 5.03 THFF : 2.57
PB Ratio TRI : 3.19 THFF : 1.26
Total Revenue (TTM) TRI : $7.66B THFF : $320.85M
Gross Profit (TTM) TRI : $4.11B THFF : $193.05M
EBITDA (TTM) TRI : $3.11B THFF : $81.43M

Return for Risk

TRI vs. THFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRI

TRI Risk / Return Rank: 4
TRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
TRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
TRI Omega Ratio Rank: 2
TRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TRI Martin Ratio Rank: 7

THFF

THFF Risk / Return Rank: 80
THFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
THFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
THFF Omega Ratio Rank: 76
THFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
THFF Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRI vs. THFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and First Financial Corporation (THFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRI	THFF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.31	1.55	-2.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.21	2.28	-4.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.72	1.27	-0.55
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	2.97	-3.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.41	7.69	-9.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRI vs. THFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRI Sharpe Ratio is -1.31, which is lower than the THFF Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRI and THFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRI	THFF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.31	1.55	-2.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.03	0.48	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.34	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.27	+0.03

Drawdowns

TRI vs. THFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRI drawdown since its inception was -62.54%, which is greater than THFF's maximum drawdown of -51.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRI and THFF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRI	THFF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.54%	-51.80%	-10.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.54%	-13.18%	-49.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-62.54%	-20.25%	-42.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-62.54%	-34.92%	-27.62%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.54%	-42.73%	-19.81%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-58.78%	-0.26%	-58.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.52%	-16.59%	+5.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.50%	5.08%	+34.42%

Volatility

TRI vs. THFF - Volatility Comparison

Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a higher volatility of 19.39% compared to First Financial Corporation (THFF) at 6.38%. This indicates that TRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRI	THFF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.39%	6.38%	+13.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.35%	18.16%	+19.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.40%	26.65%	+15.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.87%	26.41%	-0.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.57%	29.19%	-5.62%

Dividends

TRI vs. THFF - Dividend Comparison

TRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than THFF's 3.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
THFF First Financial Corporation	3.08%	3.38%	2.92%	4.02%	2.54%	2.34%	2.68%	2.25%	2.54%	5.51%	1.88%	2.88%
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp	4.59%	1.80%	1.35%	4.68%	1.56%	1.76%	1.86%	2.01%	2.87%	3.17%	3.11%	3.54%

Financials

TRI vs. THFF - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Thomson Reuters Corp and First Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

TRI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported a gross profit of 630.15M and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.

THFF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 77.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

TRI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported an operating income of 630.15M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.6%.

THFF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 77.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

TRI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported a net income of 452.64M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.

THFF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Financial Corporation reported a net income of 19.80M and revenue of 77.95M, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRI and THFF in my portfolio?

TRI and THFF have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRI or THFF?

TRI has higher volatility (19.39%) compared to THFF (6.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRI dropped -62.54% vs THFF's -51.80%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.