TRI vs. THFF
TRI (Thomson Reuters Corp) and THFF (First Financial Corporation) are both stocks. TRI operates in Specialty Business Services (Industrials), while THFF operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, TRI returned 9.66%/yr vs 11.16%/yr for THFF. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRI vs. THFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRI achieves a -37.89% return, which is significantly lower than THFF's 26.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TRI has underperformed THFF with an annualized return of 9.66%, while THFF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.16% annualized return.
TRI
- 1D
- 5.43%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- -37.89%
- 6M
- -38.43%
- 1Y
- -57.85%
- 3Y*
- -14.04%
- 5Y*
- -2.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.66%
THFF
- 1D
- 1.46%
- 1M
- 9.54%
- YTD
- 26.61%
- 6M
- 22.62%
- 1Y
- 47.96%
- 3Y*
- 37.42%
- 5Y*
- 15.72%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
TRI vs. THFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | -37.89% | -16.57% | 11.14% | 30.31% | -3.01% | 49.18% | 16.71% | 51.59% | 14.56% | 2.68% |
THFF First Financial Corporation | 26.61% | 36.17% | 11.11% | -2.62% | 4.45% | 19.47% | -12.74% | 16.79% | -9.41% | -9.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRI and THFF is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2002 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TRI and THFF has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
TRI:
$35.33B
THFF:
$892.80M
TRI:
$3.42
THFF:
$6.80
TRI:
23.60
THFF:
11.05
TRI:
4.70
THFF:
2.78
TRI:
2.98
THFF:
1.36
TRI:
$7.66B
THFF:
$320.85M
TRI:
$4.11B
THFF:
$193.05M
TRI:
$3.11B
THFF:
$81.43M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRI vs. THFF — Risk / Return Rank
TRI
THFF
TRI vs. THFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and First Financial Corporation (THFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRI | THFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.71 | 1.31 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 3.66 | -4.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.38 | 9.49 | -10.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRI vs. THFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRI drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than THFF's maximum drawdown of -51.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRI and THFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRI | THFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.45% | -51.80% | -11.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.45% | -13.18% | -50.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.45% | -20.25% | -43.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.45% | -34.92% | -28.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.45% | -42.73% | -20.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.46% | 0.00% | -61.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.63% | -16.56% | +4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.04% | 5.07% | +36.97% |
Volatility
TRI vs. THFF - Volatility Comparison
Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a higher volatility of 15.99% compared to First Financial Corporation (THFF) at 7.32%. This indicates that TRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRI | THFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.99% | 7.32% | +8.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.17% | 18.50% | +19.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.22% | 26.99% | +16.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.16% | 26.36% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.69% | 29.24% | -5.55% |
Dividends
TRI vs. THFF - Dividend Comparison
TRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than THFF's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
THFF First Financial Corporation | 2.85% | 3.38% | 2.92% | 4.02% | 2.54% | 2.34% | 2.68% | 2.25% | 2.54% | 5.51% | 1.88% | 2.88% |
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | 4.91% | 1.80% | 1.35% | 4.68% | 1.56% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.87% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
Financials
TRI vs. THFF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Thomson Reuters Corp and First Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRI vs. THFF - Profitability Comparison
TRI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported a gross profit of 630.15M and revenue of 2.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.
THFF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 77.95M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TRI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported an operating income of 630.15M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.6%.
THFF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 77.95M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
TRI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Thomson Reuters Corp reported a net income of 452.64M and revenue of 2.06B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.
THFF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, First Financial Corporation reported a net income of 19.80M and revenue of 77.95M, resulting in a net margin of 25.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRI and THFF have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRI has higher volatility (15.99%) compared to THFF (7.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRI dropped -63.45% vs THFF's -51.80%.
THFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs -1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRI and THFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer