TRI vs. RELX
Compare and contrast key facts about Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and RELX PLC (RELX).
Performance
TRI vs. RELX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRI vs. RELX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | -32.73% | -16.57% | 11.14% | 30.31% | -3.01% | 49.18% | 16.71% | 51.59% | 14.56% | 2.68% |
RELX RELX PLC | -17.79% | -9.60% | 16.59% | 46.09% | -13.06% | 35.47% | 0.27% | 25.28% | -11.20% | 34.97% |
Fundamentals
TRI:
$39.23B
RELX:
$60.92B
TRI:
$3.34
RELX:
$2.17
TRI:
26.32
RELX:
15.30
TRI:
5.20
RELX:
3.22
TRI:
3.29
RELX:
25.80
TRI:
$7.61B
RELX:
$18.99B
TRI:
$2.00B
RELX:
$12.35B
TRI:
$2.34B
RELX:
$6.05B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRI achieves a -32.73% return, which is significantly lower than RELX's -17.79% return. Over the past 10 years, TRI has outperformed RELX with an annualized return of 10.48%, while RELX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.23% annualized return.
TRI
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -11.50%
- YTD
- -32.73%
- 6M
- -41.60%
- 1Y
- -48.47%
- 3Y*
- -10.80%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.48%
RELX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -4.18%
- YTD
- -17.79%
- 6M
- -29.40%
- 1Y
- -33.38%
- 3Y*
- 2.65%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRI vs. RELX — Risk / Return Rank
TRI
RELX
TRI vs. RELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and RELX PLC (RELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRI | RELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | -1.10 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | -1.50 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.73 | 0.79 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | -0.66 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.52 | -1.45 | -0.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRI | RELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.29 | -1.10 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.34 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.37 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.32 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRI and RELX is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TRI vs. RELX - Dividend Comparison
TRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than RELX's 2.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | 2.77% | 1.80% | 1.35% | 4.68% | 1.56% | 1.76% | 1.86% | 2.01% | 2.87% | 3.17% | 3.11% | 3.54% |
RELX RELX PLC | 2.47% | 2.03% | 1.68% | 1.73% | 2.42% | 2.05% | 2.39% | 1.57% | 2.68% | 2.05% | 2.55% | 2.28% |
Drawdowns
TRI vs. RELX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRI drawdown since its inception was -61.67%, which is greater than RELX's maximum drawdown of -49.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRI and RELX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRI | RELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.67% | -49.91% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.67% | -49.91% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.67% | -49.91% | -11.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.67% | -49.91% | -11.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.26% | -39.98% | -18.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -12.13% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.72% | 22.83% | +8.89% |
Volatility
TRI vs. RELX - Volatility Comparison
Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a higher volatility of 11.80% compared to RELX PLC (RELX) at 7.41%. This indicates that TRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRI | RELX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.80% | 7.41% | +4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.30% | 25.26% | +7.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.76% | 30.38% | +7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 22.12% | +1.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.56% | 22.12% | +0.44% |
Financials
TRI vs. RELX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Thomson Reuters Corp and RELX PLC. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities