PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
TRI vs. SPGI
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


TRISPGI
YTD Return16.79%14.98%
1Y Return28.91%28.57%
3Y Return (Ann)15.41%4.49%
5Y Return (Ann)22.44%15.17%
10Y Return (Ann)19.32%19.91%
Sharpe Ratio1.711.81
Sortino Ratio2.722.33
Omega Ratio1.331.32
Calmar Ratio2.591.78
Martin Ratio7.806.05
Ulcer Index3.97%4.77%
Daily Std Dev18.10%15.94%
Max Drawdown-56.40%-74.68%
Current Drawdown-3.49%-4.83%

Fundamentals


TRISPGI
Market Cap$76.31B$156.23B
EPS$4.93$11.33
PE Ratio34.3844.44
PEG Ratio3.641.50
Total Revenue (TTM)$7.22B$13.77B
Gross Profit (TTM)$1.97B$9.17B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.76B$6.39B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between TRI and SPGI is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

TRI vs. SPGI - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, TRI achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than SPGI's 14.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRI having a 19.32% annualized return and SPGI not far ahead at 19.91%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.08%
16.01%
TRI
SPGI

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRI vs. SPGI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and S&P Global Inc. (SPGI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TRI, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.71
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TRI, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TRI, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TRI, currently valued at 2.59, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TRI, currently valued at 7.80, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.007.80
SPGI
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SPGI, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.81
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SPGI, currently valued at 2.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.002.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SPGI, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SPGI, currently valued at 1.78, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SPGI, currently valued at 6.05, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.006.05

TRI vs. SPGI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRI Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the SPGI Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRI and SPGI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.71
1.81
TRI
SPGI

Dividends

TRI vs. SPGI - Dividend Comparison

TRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than SPGI's 0.72% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corp
1.24%4.68%1.62%1.41%1.93%2.09%2.30%3.29%3.23%3.68%3.40%3.57%
SPGI
S&P Global Inc.
0.72%0.82%0.99%0.65%0.82%0.84%1.18%0.97%1.34%1.34%1.35%1.43%

Drawdowns

TRI vs. SPGI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRI drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, smaller than the maximum SPGI drawdown of -74.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRI and SPGI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.49%
-4.83%
TRI
SPGI

Volatility

TRI vs. SPGI - Volatility Comparison

Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to S&P Global Inc. (SPGI) at 5.46%. This indicates that TRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPGI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.78%
5.46%
TRI
SPGI

Financials

TRI vs. SPGI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Thomson Reuters Corp and S&P Global Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items