TRI vs. IFC.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TRI or IFC.TO.
Key characteristics
| TRI | IFC.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 16.79% | 33.56% |
| 1Y Return | 28.91% | 31.42% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 15.41% | 19.34% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 22.44% | 17.26% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 19.32% | 15.66% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.71 | 2.08 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.72 | 3.09 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.33 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.59 | 4.51 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.80 | 10.74 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.97% | 3.04% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.10% | 15.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -56.40% | -53.53% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.49% | -1.38% |
Fundamentals
| TRI | IFC.TO | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $76.31B | CA$47.81B |
| EPS | $4.93 | CA$11.58 |
| PE Ratio | 34.38 | 23.15 |
| PEG Ratio | 3.64 | 0.87 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $7.22B | CA$27.02B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.97B | CA$20.44B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $2.76B | CA$993.00M |
Correlation
The correlation between TRI and IFC.TO is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
TRI vs. IFC.TO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, TRI achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly lower than IFC.TO's 33.56% return. Over the past 10 years, TRI has outperformed IFC.TO with an annualized return of 19.32%, while IFC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.66% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TRI vs. IFC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TRI vs. IFC.TO - Dividend Comparison
TRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, less than IFC.TO's 1.76% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp | 1.24% | 4.68% | 1.62% | 1.41% | 1.93% | 2.09% | 2.30% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.68% | 3.40% | 3.57% |
IFC.TO Intact Financial Corporation | 1.76% | 2.16% | 2.05% | 2.07% | 2.20% | 2.16% | 2.82% | 2.44% | 2.41% | 2.39% | 2.29% | 2.54% |
Drawdowns
TRI vs. IFC.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRI drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, which is greater than IFC.TO's maximum drawdown of -53.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRI and IFC.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TRI vs. IFC.TO - Volatility Comparison
Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Intact Financial Corporation (IFC.TO) at 5.13%. This indicates that TRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TRI vs. IFC.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Thomson Reuters Corp and Intact Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities