PortfoliosLab logo
TRI vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between TRI and SCHG is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

TRI vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

TRI:

0.69

SCHG:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

TRI:

1.17

SCHG:

0.86

Omega Ratio

TRI:

1.15

SCHG:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

TRI:

1.15

SCHG:

0.53

Martin Ratio

TRI:

2.72

SCHG:

1.78

Ulcer Index

TRI:

5.06%

SCHG:

7.00%

Daily Std Dev

TRI:

19.09%

SCHG:

24.88%

Max Drawdown

TRI:

-56.30%

SCHG:

-34.59%

Current Drawdown

TRI:

-0.62%

SCHG:

-10.70%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRI achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's -6.76% return. Over the past 10 years, TRI has outperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 19.87%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively lower 15.31% annualized return.


TRI

YTD

17.25%

1M

10.19%

6M

12.15%

1Y

13.12%

5Y*

25.34%

10Y*

19.87%

SCHG

YTD

-6.76%

1M

4.47%

6M

-6.25%

1Y

12.34%

5Y*

17.90%

10Y*

15.31%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

TRI vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TRI is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TRI is 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TRI is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TRI is 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TRI is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TRI is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCHG is 6060
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCHG is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCHG is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

TRI vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current TRI Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRI and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

TRI vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

TRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than SCHG's 0.44% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corp
1.18%1.35%4.53%1.56%1.35%1.86%2.01%2.36%3.49%3.42%3.90%3.60%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.44%0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%

Drawdowns

TRI vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRI drawdown since its inception was -56.30%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRI and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

TRI vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...