TRI vs. SCHG

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

TRI (Thomson Reuters Corp) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, TRI returned 10.55%/yr vs 18.70%/yr for SCHG. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

TRI vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRI achieves a -31.35% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 4.83% return. Over the past 10 years, TRI has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 10.55%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.70% annualized return.

TRI

• 1D: 5.06%
• 1M: 3.34%
• 6M: -31.35%
• YTD: -31.35%
• 1Y: -54.07%
• 3Y*: -11.04%
• 5Y*: -0.63%
• 10Y*: 10.55%

SCHG

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -2.69%
• 6M: 4.83%
• YTD: 4.83%
• 1Y: 17.66%
• 3Y*: 22.65%
• 5Y*: 13.51%
• 10Y*: 18.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRI vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp	-31.35%	-16.57%	11.14%	30.31%	-3.01%	49.18%	16.71%	51.59%	14.56%	2.68%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	4.83%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between TRI and SCHG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between TRI and SCHG has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TRI vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRI

TRI Risk / Return Rank: 6
TRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
TRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
TRI Omega Ratio Rank: 3
TRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TRI Martin Ratio Rank: 14

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 31
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRI vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRI	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.24	1.09	-2.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.07	1.54	-3.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.74	1.20	-0.45
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	1.08	-1.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	3.47	-4.72

TRI vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRI Sharpe Ratio is -1.24, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRI and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRI vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRI drawdown since its inception was -63.45%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRI and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRI	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.45%	-34.59%	-28.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.45%	-16.41%	-47.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-63.45%	-23.39%	-40.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.45%	-34.59%	-28.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.45%	-34.59%	-28.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-57.40%	-3.24%	-54.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.69%	-5.20%	-6.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.22%	5.10%	+38.12%

Volatility

TRI vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Thomson Reuters Corp (TRI) has a higher volatility of 11.97% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 6.33%. This indicates that TRI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRI	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.97%	6.33%	+5.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	38.96%	12.69%	+26.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.86%	16.28%	+27.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.38%	22.40%	+3.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.75%	21.56%	+2.19%

Dividends

TRI vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

TRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than SCHG's 0.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.39%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%
TRI Thomson Reuters Corp	4.44%	1.80%	1.35%	4.68%	1.56%	1.76%	1.86%	2.01%	2.87%	3.17%	3.11%	3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRI and SCHG in my portfolio?

TRI and SCHG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRI or SCHG?

TRI has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to SCHG (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRI dropped -63.45% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.