TR vs. EMR
TR (Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc.) and EMR (Emerson Electric Co.) are both stocks. TR operates in Confectioners (Consumer Defensive), while EMR operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, TR returned 3.00%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for EMR. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TR vs. EMR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TR achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly higher than EMR's 5.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TR has underperformed EMR with an annualized return of 3.00%, while EMR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.97% annualized return.
TR
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -10.64%
- YTD
- 7.02%
- 6M
- 5.55%
- 1Y
- 13.98%
- 3Y*
- 3.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
EMR
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -1.19%
- YTD
- 5.61%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.45%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
TR vs. EMR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 7.02% | 17.87% | 1.36% | -18.76% | 22.25% | 27.01% | -12.02% | 3.23% | -7.18% | -4.77% |
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 5.61% | 8.92% | 29.73% | 3.75% | 5.74% | 18.19% | 8.61% | 31.53% | -11.87% | 29.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between TR and EMR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987 | 0.26 |
The correlation between TR and EMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TR:
$2.85B
EMR:
$78.30B
TR:
$1.36
EMR:
$4.33
TR:
27.99
EMR:
32.10
TR:
2.36
EMR:
11.41
TR:
3.79
EMR:
4.28
TR:
3.00
EMR:
3.85
TR:
$735.61M
EMR:
$18.32B
TR:
$257.59M
EMR:
$7.22B
TR:
$138.31M
EMR:
$3.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TR vs. EMR — Risk / Return Rank
TR
EMR
TR vs. EMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TR | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.11 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 0.62 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.60 | 1.35 | +0.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TR | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 0.48 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.35 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.45 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.34 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
TR vs. EMR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TR drawdown since its inception was -44.74%, smaller than the maximum EMR drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR and EMR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TR | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.74% | -59.05% | +14.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.03% | -23.45% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.37% | -29.62% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.41% | -29.62% | -6.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.41% | -50.77% | +14.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.24% | -13.31% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.76% | -14.11% | -2.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.76% | 10.68% | -1.92% |
Volatility
TR vs. EMR - Volatility Comparison
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) at 7.27%. This indicates that TR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TR | EMR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 7.27% | +1.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.41% | 24.63% | -8.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.36% | 30.04% | -3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 27.25% | -2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.27% | 29.10% | -3.83% |
Dividends
TR vs. EMR - Dividend Comparison
TR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than EMR's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMR Emerson Electric Co. | 1.58% | 1.61% | 1.70% | 2.14% | 2.15% | 2.18% | 2.49% | 2.58% | 3.26% | 2.76% | 3.42% | 3.94% |
TR Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 0.93% | 0.98% | 1.11% | 1.08% | 0.85% | 0.99% | 1.21% | 1.05% | 1.08% | 0.99% | 0.91% | 1.11% |
Financials
TR vs. EMR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. and Emerson Electric Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TR vs. EMR - Profitability Comparison
TR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 49.77M and revenue of 151.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.8%.
EMR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 23.21M and revenue of 151.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.3%.
EMR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
TR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 17.66M and revenue of 151.54M, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
EMR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Emerson Electric Co. reported a net income of 618.00M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TR and EMR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TR has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to EMR (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TR dropped -44.74% vs EMR's -59.05%.
TR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TR and EMR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer