TR vs. GIS

In the year-to-date period, TR achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -5.38% return. Over the past 10 years, TR has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of 3.46%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 4.04% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current TR Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is higher than the GIS Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TR and GIS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

TR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, less than GIS's 4.00% yield.

The maximum TR drawdown since its inception was -46.66%, roughly equal to the maximum GIS drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) is NaN%, while General Mills, Inc. (GIS) has a volatility of NaN%. This indicates that TR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.