TR vs. GIS
Compare and contrast key facts about Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TR or GIS.
Correlation
The correlation between TR and GIS is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
TR vs. GIS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TR:
-0.41
GIS:
-0.24
TR:
-0.47
GIS:
-0.20
TR:
0.95
GIS:
0.98
TR:
-0.26
GIS:
-0.15
TR:
-1.15
GIS:
-0.60
TR:
8.21%
GIS:
7.57%
TR:
22.67%
GIS:
18.94%
TR:
-46.73%
GIS:
-45.08%
TR:
-29.77%
GIS:
-31.45%
Fundamentals
TR:
$1.26B
GIS:
$32.14B
TR:
$1.31
GIS:
$4.60
TR:
23.37
GIS:
12.68
TR:
0.00
GIS:
3.48
TR:
$529.85M
GIS:
$19.90B
TR:
$178.66M
GIS:
$6.95B
TR:
$71.36M
GIS:
$4.08B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TR achieves a -5.32% return, which is significantly higher than GIS's -7.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TR has underperformed GIS with an annualized return of 4.14%, while GIS has yielded a comparatively higher 4.39% annualized return.
TR
-5.32%
-3.72%
1.65%
-7.00%
1.60%
4.14%
GIS
-7.61%
-10.19%
-9.08%
-3.72%
5.00%
4.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TR vs. GIS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TR
GIS
TR vs. GIS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) and General Mills, Inc. (GIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TR vs. GIS - Dividend Comparison
TR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than GIS's 4.10% yield.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. | 1.17% | 1.10% | 1.08% | 0.85% | 1.27% | 1.21% | 1.09% | 1.14% | 1.05% | 0.95% | 1.17% | 1.10% |
General Mills, Inc. | 4.10% | 3.73% | 3.47% | 2.50% | 3.03% | 3.37% | 3.66% | 5.03% | 3.27% | 3.01% | 3.00% | 3.02% |
Drawdowns
TR vs. GIS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TR drawdown since its inception was -46.73%, roughly equal to the maximum GIS drawdown of -45.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TR and GIS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TR vs. GIS - Volatility Comparison
Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. (TR) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to General Mills, Inc. (GIS) at 6.32%. This indicates that TR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
TR vs. GIS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tootsie Roll Industries, Inc. and General Mills, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities