PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TPYP vs. XES
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TPYP vs. XES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TPYP achieves a 20.07% return, which is significantly lower than XES's 50.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TPYP has outperformed XES with an annualized return of 11.93%, while XES has yielded a comparatively lower -2.47% annualized return.


TPYP

1D
-0.04%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
20.07%
6M
19.62%
1Y
21.07%
3Y*
25.01%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
11.93%

XES

1D
-0.56%
1M
-4.59%
YTD
50.69%
6M
43.67%
1Y
97.14%
3Y*
19.81%
5Y*
13.75%
10Y*
-2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TPYP vs. XES - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
20.07%7.59%37.37%10.51%16.09%34.97%-20.99%23.35%-11.13%2.27%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
50.69%5.89%-5.44%6.68%62.03%12.00%-43.38%-9.00%-46.99%-21.93%

Correlation

The correlation between TPYP and XES is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2015

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between TPYP and XES has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TPYP vs. XES - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TPYP
XES

Energy

68.8%
97.5%

Utilities

22.0%

-

Financial Services

2.4%

-

Basic Materials

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

2.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Energy

TPYP
68.8%
XES
97.5%

Utilities

TPYP
22.0%
XES

-

Financial Services

TPYP
2.4%
XES

-

Basic Materials

TPYP
0.1%
XES

-

Communication Services

TPYP

-

XES

-

Consumer Cyclical

TPYP

-

XES

-

Consumer Defensive

TPYP

-

XES

-

Healthcare

TPYP

-

XES

-

Industrials

TPYP

-

XES
2.5%

Real Estate

TPYP

-

XES

-

Technology

TPYP

-

XES

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TPYP vs. XES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TPYP
TPYP Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
TPYP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPYP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPYP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TPYP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPYP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

XES
XES Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XES Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XES Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
XES Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
XES Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TPYP vs. XES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) and SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TPYPXESDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.48

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

9.93

-6.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.34

26.79

-18.45

TPYP vs. XES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TPYP Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the XES Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TPYP and XES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TPYPXESDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

3.23

-1.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

0.35

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

-0.05

+0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

-0.07

+0.50

Drawdowns

TPYP vs. XES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TPYP drawdown since its inception was -51.91%, smaller than the maximum XES drawdown of -95.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TPYP and XES.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TPYPXESDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.91%

-95.65%

+43.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-9.84%

+3.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-45.95%

+32.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-45.95%

+27.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.91%

-91.23%

+39.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-70.90%

+65.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.89%

-54.36%

+46.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.64%

-1.08%

Volatility

TPYP vs. XES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund (TPYP) is 5.67%, while SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that TPYP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TPYPXESDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.67%

8.22%

-2.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

20.52%

-10.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

30.50%

-17.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

39.04%

-21.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

45.04%

-23.10%

TPYP vs. XES - Expense Ratio Comparison

TPYP has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XES's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TPYP vs. XES - Dividend Comparison

TPYP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%, more than XES's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TPYP
Tortoise North American Pipeline Fund
3.25%3.91%3.95%4.83%4.48%4.86%6.14%4.45%4.58%3.71%3.49%2.56%
XES
SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
1.12%1.69%1.31%0.66%0.36%1.81%1.33%1.43%1.14%1.68%0.64%2.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


TPYP and XES have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XES has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to TPYP (5.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TPYP dropped -51.91% vs XES's -95.65%.

On 10-year performance, TPYP leads with 11.93% vs -2.47% for XES. On fees, XES is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TPYP has been the lower-risk option at 5.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TPYP has performed better with a 11.93% return vs -2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XES is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for TPYP.

TPYP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 1.12% for XES.

TPYP tracks Tortoise North American Pipeline Index, while XES tracks S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Tortoise and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for TPYP and 0.35% for XES.

XES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TPYP and XES

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer