TNA vs. MVV
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV).
TNA and MVV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TNA is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index (300%). It was launched on Nov 5, 2008. MVV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both TNA and MVV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TNA vs. MVV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TNA vs. MVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | -1.19% | 9.82% | 7.21% | 26.24% | -62.48% | 27.88% | -7.82% | 71.88% | -39.89% | 39.15% |
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 4.75% | 3.48% | 17.75% | 22.51% | -31.96% | 48.57% | 6.20% | 49.50% | -25.44% | 30.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than MVV's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, TNA has underperformed MVV with an annualized return of 4.86%, while MVV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.
TNA
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -17.02%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -1.17%
- 1Y
- 54.96%
- 3Y*
- 13.02%
- 5Y*
- -12.87%
- 10Y*
- 4.86%
MVV
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -11.15%
- YTD
- 4.75%
- 6M
- 5.31%
- 1Y
- 24.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.18%
- 5Y*
- 3.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNA vs. MVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNA has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than MVV's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TNA vs. MVV — Risk / Return Rank
TNA
MVV
TNA vs. MVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TNA | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.57 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.09 | +0.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.15 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.46 | 0.97 | +0.49 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | 3.72 | +0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TNA | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.57 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.19 | 0.10 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 | 0.29 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | 0.24 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between TNA and MVV is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TNA vs. MVV - Dividend Comparison
TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than MVV's 0.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.93% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MVV ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 | 0.81% | 0.77% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.62% | 0.62% | 0.21% | 0.43% | 0.17% |
Drawdowns
TNA vs. MVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, roughly equal to the maximum MVV drawdown of -85.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and MVV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TNA | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.09% | -85.54% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.58% | -26.85% | -10.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.36% | -45.53% | -36.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.09% | -69.19% | -18.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -58.21% | -11.34% | -46.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.81% | -20.70% | -13.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.90% | 6.97% | +4.93% |
Volatility
TNA vs. MVV - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a higher volatility of 22.02% compared to ProShares Ultra Midcap 400 (MVV) at 12.99%. This indicates that TNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TNA | MVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.02% | 12.99% | +9.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.21% | 24.02% | +19.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.30% | 43.30% | +26.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.36% | 39.66% | +27.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.28% | 42.32% | +25.96% |