TNA vs. IWM
Compare and contrast key facts about Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM).
TNA and IWM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TNA is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index (300%). It was launched on Nov 5, 2008. IWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000. Both TNA and IWM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TNA or IWM.
Correlation
The correlation between TNA and IWM is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TNA vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TNA:
0.26
IWM:
0.69
TNA:
0.80
IWM:
1.10
TNA:
1.10
IWM:
1.13
TNA:
0.23
IWM:
0.74
TNA:
1.22
IWM:
3.63
TNA:
13.37%
IWM:
3.97%
TNA:
62.24%
IWM:
20.85%
TNA:
-88.09%
IWM:
-59.05%
TNA:
-60.73%
IWM:
-8.18%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 11.87% return. Over the past 10 years, TNA has underperformed IWM with an annualized return of 0.90%, while IWM has yielded a comparatively higher 7.83% annualized return.
TNA
9.32%
-16.09%
21.05%
7.79%
-9.65%
0.90%
IWM
11.87%
-3.62%
11.47%
12.48%
7.37%
7.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TNA vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
TNA has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TNA vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TNA vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than IWM's 1.14% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TNA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares | 0.49% | 1.27% | 0.31% | 0.06% | 0.03% | 0.44% | 0.36% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.59% | 1.53% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 1.14% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% | 1.26% | 1.23% |
Drawdowns
TNA vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, which is greater than IWM's maximum drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and IWM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TNA vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a higher volatility of 18.78% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 6.16%. This indicates that TNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.