PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TNA vs. MIDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TNA vs. MIDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TNA achieves a 56.90% return, which is significantly higher than MIDU's 37.67% return. Over the past 10 years, TNA has underperformed MIDU with an annualized return of 9.70%, while MIDU has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.


TNA

1D
-3.11%
1M
9.59%
YTD
56.90%
6M
45.88%
1Y
125.39%
3Y*
32.32%
5Y*
-5.98%
10Y*
9.70%

MIDU

1D
-3.21%
1M
6.62%
YTD
37.67%
6M
30.01%
1Y
63.47%
3Y*
26.25%
5Y*
3.28%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TNA vs. MIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
56.90%9.82%7.21%26.24%-62.48%27.88%-7.82%71.88%-39.89%39.15%
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
37.67%-2.75%20.32%27.79%-49.27%72.89%-18.31%77.38%-39.21%46.86%

Correlation

The correlation between TNA and MIDU is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2009

0.95

The correlation between TNA and MIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

TNA vs. MIDU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TNA
MIDU

Technology

19.1%
3.4%

Industrials

18.0%
5.3%

Healthcare

16.3%
1.8%

Financial Services

15.3%
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
2.0%

Real Estate

5.9%
1.5%

Energy

5.4%
1.0%

Basic Materials

4.7%
1.0%

Utilities

2.7%
0.6%

Communication Services

2.4%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.3%
0.8%

Technology

TNA
19.1%
MIDU
3.4%

Industrials

TNA
18.0%
MIDU
5.3%

Healthcare

TNA
16.3%
MIDU
1.8%

Financial Services

TNA
15.3%
MIDU
2.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TNA
8.0%
MIDU
2.0%

Real Estate

TNA
5.9%
MIDU
1.5%

Energy

TNA
5.4%
MIDU
1.0%

Basic Materials

TNA
4.7%
MIDU
1.0%

Utilities

TNA
2.7%
MIDU
0.6%

Communication Services

TNA
2.4%
MIDU
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

TNA
2.3%
MIDU
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TNA vs. MIDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TNA
TNA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TNA Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
TNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TNA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

MIDU
MIDU Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
MIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TNA vs. MIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) and Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TNAMIDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.23

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

2.47

+1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

8.20

+4.53

TNA vs. MIDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TNA Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the MIDU Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TNA and MIDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TNA vs. MIDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TNA drawdown since its inception was -88.09%, roughly equal to the maximum MIDU drawdown of -86.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TNA and MIDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TNAMIDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.09%

-86.26%

-1.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.53%

-25.80%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.78%

-60.41%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.36%

-64.14%

-18.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.09%

-86.26%

-1.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.64%

-4.17%

-29.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.92%

-22.38%

-11.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.89%

7.77%

+2.12%

Volatility

TNA vs. MIDU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares (TNA) has a higher volatility of 19.82% compared to Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares (MIDU) at 13.97%. This indicates that TNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TNAMIDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.82%

13.97%

+5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.69%

34.92%

+7.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.76%

47.39%

+11.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.57%

59.50%

+8.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.50%

63.57%

+4.93%

TNA vs. MIDU - Expense Ratio Comparison

TNA has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MIDU's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

TNA vs. MIDU - Dividend Comparison

TNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than MIDU's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MIDU
Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.65%1.04%1.10%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.06%0.71%0.70%2.67%1.89%
TNA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares
0.38%0.78%0.93%1.27%0.31%0.06%0.03%0.44%0.36%0.15%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TNA and MIDU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TNA has higher volatility (19.82%) compared to MIDU (13.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TNA dropped -88.09% vs MIDU's -86.26%.

On 10-year performance, MIDU leads with 12.98% vs 9.70% for TNA. On fees, TNA is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, MIDU has been the lower-risk option at 13.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MIDU has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TNA is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for MIDU.

MIDU has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.38% for TNA.

TNA tracks Russell 2000 Index (300% Daily), while MIDU tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.05% for TNA and 1.06% for MIDU.

TNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TNA and MIDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer