TMSIX vs. VO
TMSIX (Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TMSIX returned 12.21%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for VO. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TMSIX charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
TMSIX vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSIX achieves a 17.94% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 12.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TMSIX has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 12.21%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.50% annualized return.
TMSIX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 15.58%
- YTD
- 17.94%
- 1Y
- 23.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.02%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 12.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.80%
VO
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- 6M
- 10.12%
- YTD
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 16.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $194.51M | $293.72M | $235.90M |
TMSIX vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 17.94% | 4.64% | 14.08% | 13.90% | -17.68% | 28.06% | 21.96% | 24.88% | -10.47% | 18.90% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 12.35% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSIX and VO is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.95 |
The correlation between TMSIX and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMSIX vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
TMSIX
VO
TMSIX vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMSIX | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.21 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | 1.83 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.17 | 6.99 | +2.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMSIX vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, roughly equal to the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSIX and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSIX | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -58.87% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.97% | -8.17% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.18% | -19.02% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.57% | -27.57% | -4.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.66% | -39.37% | -1.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.49% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.95% | -7.81% | -2.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.30% | 2.13% | +0.17% |
Volatility
TMSIX vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 2.09%. This indicates that TMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMSIX | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 2.09% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.31% | 9.44% | +1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 12.61% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 17.59% | +2.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.38% | 18.86% | +1.52% |
TMSIX vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMSIX vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
TMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.51%, more than VO's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 10.51% | 12.39% | 7.91% | 1.48% | 2.86% | 10.77% | 3.26% | 2.77% | 11.64% | 7.92% | 4.10% | 11.95% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, TMSIX and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TMSIX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to VO (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMSIX dropped -56.10% vs VO's -58.87%.
TMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMSIX and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer