TMSIX vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
TMSIX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016.
Performance
TMSIX vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMSIX vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | -2.40% | 4.64% | 14.08% | 13.90% | -17.68% | 28.06% | 21.96% | 24.88% | -10.47% | 18.90% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.30% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 23.41% | -10.05% | 20.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSIX achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 4.30% return.
TMSIX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
COWZ
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 4.30%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMSIX vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMSIX vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
TMSIX
COWZ
TMSIX vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMSIX | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 0.96 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | 1.44 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.21 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.30 | -0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 6.06 | -4.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSIX | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.96 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.62 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.63 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSIX and COWZ is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMSIX vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
TMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.70%, more than COWZ's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 12.70% | 12.39% | 7.91% | 1.48% | 2.86% | 10.77% | 3.26% | 2.77% | 11.64% | 7.92% | 4.10% | 11.95% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.06% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TMSIX vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, which is greater than COWZ's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSIX and COWZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSIX | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -38.63% | -17.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -13.55% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.57% | -22.00% | -9.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -3.36% | -5.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -4.85% | -5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 2.91% | +0.38% |
Volatility
TMSIX vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 3.00%. This indicates that TMSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMSIX | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 3.00% | +2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 8.36% | +2.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 17.50% | +1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 17.73% | +2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 20.08% | +0.32% |