TMSIX vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ).
TMSIX is managed by Thrivent. It was launched on Jun 30, 1993. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999.
Performance
TMSIX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TMSIX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | -2.40% | 4.64% | 14.08% | 13.90% | -17.68% | 28.06% | 21.96% | 24.88% | -10.47% | 18.90% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | -5.93% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMSIX achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, TMSIX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 11.16%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.
TMSIX
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -8.39%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -0.70%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 11.16%
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.39%
- 1M
- -4.84%
- YTD
- -5.93%
- 6M
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 12.88%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMSIX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMSIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TMSIX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
TMSIX
QQQ
TMSIX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMSIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 1.05 | -0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | 1.63 | -1.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.23 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 1.88 | -1.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.38 | 6.95 | -5.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMSIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 1.05 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.58 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.85 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.37 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between TMSIX and QQQ is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TMSIX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
TMSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.70%, more than QQQ's 0.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMSIX Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S | 12.70% | 12.39% | 7.91% | 1.48% | 2.86% | 10.77% | 3.26% | 2.77% | 11.64% | 7.92% | 4.10% | 11.95% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
TMSIX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMSIX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMSIX and QQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMSIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -82.97% | +26.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -12.62% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.57% | -35.12% | +3.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.66% | -35.12% | -5.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.97% | -8.98% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -32.99% | +22.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 3.41% | -0.12% |
Volatility
TMSIX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thrivent Mid Cap Stock Fund Class S (TMSIX) is 5.48%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that TMSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TMSIX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 6.51% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.71% | 12.77% | -2.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.02% | 22.67% | -3.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 22.39% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 22.25% | -1.85% |