TMH vs. IYC
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return while IYC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYC.
Performance
TMH vs. IYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYC
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -1.36%
- YTD
- -2.14%
- 6M
- -3.75%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- 13.99%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.95%
TMH vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -9.14% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -2.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and IYC is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.82 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IYC
TMH vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.04 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.20%, smaller than the maximum IYC drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and IYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.20% | -53.10% | +42.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.63% | -5.84% | -3.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -9.94% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.19% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.57% | 14.63% | +10.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 20.81% | +4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.57% | 19.91% | +5.66% |
TMH vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than IYC's 0.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 5.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and IYC have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.
TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.38% for IYC.
Find the right allocation for TMH and IYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer