TMH vs. IYC
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and IYC (iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return while IYC tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. Both are passively managed. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IYC.
Performance
TMH vs. IYC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYC
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- -2.72%
- 6M
- -2.86%
- 1Y
- 3.35%
- 3Y*
- 15.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
TMH vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -5.59% |
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | -3.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and IYC is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 1.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
IYC
TMH vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMH | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -5.39 | 0.42 | -5.81 |
Drawdowns
TMH vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum IYC drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and IYC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -53.10% | +47.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -6.39% | +0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.22% | -9.95% | +5.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.95% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | IYC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.85% | 14.32% | +6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 20.73% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.85% | 19.89% | +0.96% |
TMH vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison
TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.47% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, TMH and IYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.
IYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.
TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.38% for IYC.
Find the right allocation for TMH and IYC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer