PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMH vs. IYC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TMH vs. IYC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TMH

1D
-0.03%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IYC

1D
-0.53%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
-2.72%
6M
-2.86%
1Y
3.35%
3Y*
15.36%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
11.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMH vs. IYC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TMH and IYC is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TMH vs. IYC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMH

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMH vs. IYC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TMH vs. IYC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMHIYCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-5.39

0.42

-5.81

Drawdowns

TMH vs. IYC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -5.59%, smaller than the maximum IYC drawdown of -53.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and IYC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TMHIYCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-53.10%

+47.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-6.39%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.22%

-9.95%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

Volatility

TMH vs. IYC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TMHIYCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.85%

14.32%

+6.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.85%

20.73%

+0.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.85%

19.89%

+0.96%

TMH vs. IYC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than IYC's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

TMH vs. IYC - Dividend Comparison

TMH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.51%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
TMH
Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, TMH and IYC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.

IYC has the higher dividend yield at 0.51%, compared with 0.00% for TMH.

TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.38% for IYC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TMH and IYC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer