PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. XLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYC vs. XLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -3.42% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -4.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 11.80%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.73% annualized return.


IYC

1D
-0.27%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
-3.42%
6M
-4.50%
1Y
2.57%
3Y*
13.50%
5Y*
5.77%
10Y*
11.80%

XLY

1D
-1.03%
1M
-4.36%
YTD
-4.35%
6M
-6.51%
1Y
6.94%
3Y*
12.11%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
12.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYC vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-3.42%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
-4.35%7.37%26.51%39.64%-36.27%27.93%29.63%28.39%1.58%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and XLY is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2000

0.94

The correlation between IYC and XLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYC vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYC
XLY

Consumer Cyclical

67.8%
97.3%

Communication Services

13.4%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

11.2%

-

Technology

3.8%
0.9%

Industrials

3.6%
0.1%

Energy

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYC
67.8%
XLY
97.3%

Communication Services

IYC
13.4%
XLY
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

IYC
11.2%
XLY

-

Technology

IYC
3.8%
XLY
0.9%

Industrials

IYC
3.6%
XLY
0.1%

Energy

IYC
0.1%
XLY

-

Basic Materials

IYC

-

XLY

-

Financial Services

IYC

-

XLY

-

Healthcare

IYC

-

XLY

-

Real Estate

IYC

-

XLY

-

Utilities

IYC

-

XLY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

XLY
XLY Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
XLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLY Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLY Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYC vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYCXLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.08

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

0.47

-0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

1.40

-0.78

IYC vs. XLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the XLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and XLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYC vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and XLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCXLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-59.05%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-14.98%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-26.01%

+4.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

-39.67%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-39.67%

+3.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.07%

-8.28%

+1.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-9.55%

-0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

4.97%

-0.80%

Volatility

IYC vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 4.93%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYCXLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.93%

6.48%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.18%

13.82%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.65%

18.55%

-3.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

23.91%

-3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

22.09%

-2.18%

IYC vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYC vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than XLY's 0.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.52%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%
XLY
Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund
0.79%0.79%0.72%0.78%1.00%0.53%0.82%1.28%1.34%1.20%1.71%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IYC and XLY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XLY has higher volatility (6.48%) compared to IYC (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs XLY's -59.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.73% vs 11.80% for IYC. On fees, XLY is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.73% return vs 11.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLY is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.

XLY has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.52% for IYC.

IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.13% for XLY.

XLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYC and XLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer