IYC vs. XLY
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares US Consumer Services ETF (IYC) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY).
IYC and XLY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IYC is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2000. XLY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both IYC and XLY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IYC or XLY.
Key characteristics
| IYC | XLY | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 25.82% | 22.91% |
| 1Y Return | 35.86% | 31.41% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 4.30% | 3.20% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 12.00% | 13.51% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 12.17% | 13.50% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.69 | 2.00 |
| Sortino Ratio | 3.58 | 2.71 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.46 | 1.34 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.16 | 1.78 |
| Martin Ratio | 14.36 | 9.71 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.78% | 3.69% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.87% | 17.93% |
| Max Drawdown | -53.10% | -59.05% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYC and XLY is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IYC vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a 25.82% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's 22.91% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 12.17%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 13.50% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IYC vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYC has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLY's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IYC vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares US Consumer Services ETF (IYC) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IYC vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than XLY's 0.69% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYC iShares US Consumer Services ETF | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.39% | 0.65% | 0.89% | 0.90% | 0.92% | 1.10% | 1.03% | 0.78% | 0.79% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.69% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% | 1.31% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
IYC vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, smaller than the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and XLY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IYC vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares US Consumer Services ETF (IYC) is 4.44%, while Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.