PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYC vs. FDIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYC vs. FDIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYC achieves a -3.16% return, which is significantly lower than FDIS's -1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, IYC has underperformed FDIS with an annualized return of 11.83%, while FDIS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.99% annualized return.


IYC

1D
-1.71%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
-3.16%
6M
-4.48%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
11.83%

FDIS

1D
-1.74%
1M
-1.89%
YTD
-1.40%
6M
-3.81%
1Y
11.16%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
5.44%
10Y*
13.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYC vs. FDIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
-3.16%7.85%27.54%34.03%-31.78%19.65%24.58%27.36%1.76%19.87%
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
-1.40%5.67%24.43%40.48%-35.23%24.25%49.50%27.44%-0.88%22.96%

Correlation

The correlation between IYC and FDIS is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013

0.96

The correlation between IYC and FDIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

IYC vs. FDIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYC
FDIS

Consumer Cyclical

67.8%
96.7%

Communication Services

13.4%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

11.2%
1.1%

Technology

3.8%
1.0%

Industrials

3.6%
0.9%

Energy

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYC
67.8%
FDIS
96.7%

Communication Services

IYC
13.4%
FDIS
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

IYC
11.2%
FDIS
1.1%

Technology

IYC
3.8%
FDIS
1.0%

Industrials

IYC
3.6%
FDIS
0.9%

Energy

IYC
0.1%
FDIS

-

Basic Materials

IYC

-

FDIS

-

Financial Services

IYC

-

FDIS
0.1%

Healthcare

IYC

-

FDIS
0.1%

Real Estate

IYC

-

FDIS
0.1%

Utilities

IYC

-

FDIS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYC vs. FDIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYC
IYC Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IYC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYC Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
IYC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FDIS
FDIS Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FDIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDIS Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
FDIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYC vs. FDIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYCFDISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.11

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

0.72

-0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.07

2.21

-1.14

IYC vs. FDIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYC Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the FDIS Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYC and FDIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYC vs. FDIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYC drawdown since its inception was -53.10%, which is greater than FDIS's maximum drawdown of -39.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYC and FDIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYCFDISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.10%

-39.16%

-13.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.97%

-15.50%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.62%

-27.43%

+5.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.90%

-39.16%

+3.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.90%

-39.16%

+3.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.81%

-5.93%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.94%

-7.49%

-2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

5.05%

-0.90%

Volatility

IYC vs. FDIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF (IYC) is 4.94%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF (FDIS) has a volatility of 6.33%. This indicates that IYC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYCFDISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

6.33%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.21%

13.87%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.68%

18.76%

-4.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.80%

23.98%

-3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.94%

22.36%

-2.42%

IYC vs. FDIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIS's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYC vs. FDIS - Dividend Comparison

IYC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than FDIS's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDIS
Fidelity MSCI Consumer Discretionary Index ETF
0.74%0.75%0.69%0.78%1.00%0.58%0.59%1.14%1.29%1.00%1.62%1.25%
IYC
iShares U.S. Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.51%0.51%0.47%0.68%0.68%0.39%0.65%0.89%0.90%0.92%1.10%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, IYC and FDIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDIS has higher volatility (6.33%) compared to IYC (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYC dropped -53.10% vs FDIS's -39.16%.

On 10-year performance, FDIS leads with 13.99% vs 11.83% for IYC. On fees, FDIS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IYC has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDIS has performed better with a 13.99% return vs 11.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDIS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for IYC.

FDIS has the higher dividend yield at 0.74%, compared with 0.51% for IYC.

IYC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index, while FDIS tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Discretionary 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYC and 0.08% for FDIS.

FDIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.60 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYC and FDIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer