TMH vs. ISHP
TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) and ISHP (First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds - TMH tracks the Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return while ISHP tracks the S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TMH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ISHP.
Performance
TMH vs. ISHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TMH
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 2.35%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISHP
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 3.63%
- 6M
- -12.02%
- YTD
- -9.43%
- 1Y
- -10.08%
- 3Y*
- 8.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- —
TMH vs. ISHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | -2.25% |
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 4.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMH and ISHP is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMH vs. ISHP — Risk / Return Rank
TMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISHP
TMH vs. ISHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH) and First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF (ISHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMH | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.92 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.75 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMH vs. ISHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMH drawdown since its inception was -10.32%, smaller than the maximum ISHP drawdown of -47.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMH and ISHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMH | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.32% | -47.57% | +37.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -47.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.78% | -16.79% | +14.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.90% | -12.74% | +6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.40% | — |
Volatility
TMH vs. ISHP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMH | ISHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.05% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.94% | 17.83% | +8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 27.29% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 24.03% | +1.91% |
TMH vs. ISHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than ISHP's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMH vs. ISHP - Dividend Comparison
TMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, more than ISHP's 1.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHP First Trust S-Network Global E-Commerce ETF | 1.15% | 1.34% | 1.02% | 1.58% | 0.76% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.16% | 0.89% | 1.65% | 0.23% |
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged | 4.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMH and ISHP have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ISHP.
TMH has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 1.15% for ISHP.
TMH tracks Toyota Motor Corporation Local Shares Total Return, while ISHP tracks S-Network Global E-Commerce Index. They also come from different issuers: ADRhedged and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for TMH and 0.60% for ISHP.
Find the right allocation for TMH and ISHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer