TMFS vs. MFIG
TMFS (Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF) and MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFS is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while MFIG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index. TMFS is actively managed, while MFIG is passively managed. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TMFS charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MFIG.
Performance
TMFS vs. MFIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFS achieves a 4.23% return, which is significantly lower than MFIG's 4.50% return.
TMFS
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 4.23%
- 1Y
- 5.66%
- 3Y*
- 7.42%
- 5Y*
- -1.00%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.49%
MFIG
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- 6M
- 6.24%
- YTD
- 4.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $67.97K | $131.98K | $231.68K | |
| $110.91K | $114.36K | $199.28K |
TMFS vs. MFIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | 4.23% | -0.83% |
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 4.50% | -0.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFS and MFIG is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.63 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFS vs. MFIG — Risk / Return Rank
TMFS
MFIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMFS vs. MFIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFS | MFIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.99 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFS vs. MFIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFS drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than MFIG's maximum drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFS and MFIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFS | MFIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.79% | -14.29% | -34.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.55% | -1.97% | -13.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -4.32% | -15.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | — | — |
Volatility
TMFS vs. MFIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFS | MFIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.85% | 16.87% | +2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 16.87% | +6.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.38% | 16.87% | +8.51% |
TMFS vs. MFIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than MFIG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFS vs. MFIG - Dividend Comparison
Neither TMFS nor MFIG has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 2.37% | 5.57% | 2.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFS and MFIG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFS.
TMFS and MFIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
TMFS is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while MFIG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFS and 0.50% for MFIG.
Find the right allocation for TMFS and MFIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer