MFIG vs. TMFM
MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) and TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFIG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. MFIG is passively managed, while TMFM is actively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MFIG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TMFM.
Performance
MFIG vs. TMFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly higher than TMFM's -5.79% return.
MFIG
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -2.33%
- 6M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
TMFM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- 6M
- -2.45%
- YTD
- -5.79%
- 1Y
- -14.17%
- 3Y*
- 1.83%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -2.04%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $110.73K | $153.60K | $228.83K | |
| $157.21K | $169.51K | $230.30K |
MFIG vs. TMFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 2.59% | -0.09% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -5.79% | -0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFIG and TMFM is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFIG vs. TMFM — Risk / Return Rank
MFIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMFM
MFIG vs. TMFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFIG | TMFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.88 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.62 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFIG vs. TMFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum TMFM drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and TMFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFIG | TMFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -31.75% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -23.34% | +19.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -16.16% | +11.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 14.51% | — |
Volatility
MFIG vs. TMFM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFIG | TMFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.01% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.77% | 19.69% | -2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 20.60% | -3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.77% | 20.60% | -3.83% |
MFIG vs. TMFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TMFM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFIG vs. TMFM - Dividend Comparison
MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFIG and TMFM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
TMFM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.
MFIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TMFM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.85% for TMFM.
Find the right allocation for MFIG and TMFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer