MFIG vs. TMFM
MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) and TMFM (Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFIG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while TMFM is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. MFIG is passively managed, while TMFM is actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFIG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TMFM.
Performance
MFIG vs. TMFM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than TMFM's -6.90% return.
MFIG
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFM
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 2.46%
- 6M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- -6.90%
- 1Y
- -16.65%
- 3Y*
- 2.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFIG vs. TMFM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 5.11% | -0.09% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -6.90% | -0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFIG and TMFM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFIG vs. TMFM — Risk / Return Rank
MFIG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMFM
MFIG vs. TMFM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFIG | TMFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.87 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.63 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFIG vs. TMFM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum TMFM drawdown of -31.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and TMFM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFIG | TMFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -31.75% | +17.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.39% | -24.24% | +22.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.43% | -16.05% | +11.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 15.34% | — |
Volatility
MFIG vs. TMFM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFIG | TMFM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.37% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.91% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.06% | 19.13% | -2.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 20.57% | -3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 20.57% | -3.51% |
MFIG vs. TMFM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TMFM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFIG vs. TMFM - Dividend Comparison
MFIG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMFM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFM Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.07% | 0.06% | 16.27% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFIG and TMFM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFM.
TMFM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.00% for MFIG.
MFIG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TMFM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.85% for TMFM.
Find the right allocation for MFIG and TMFM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer