MFIG vs. CENX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index, while CENX (Century Aluminum Company) is a stock. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MFIG vs. CENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than CENX's 20.80% return.

MFIG

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -2.41%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 6M: -1.71%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CENX

• 1D: -4.44%
• 1M: -27.24%
• YTD: 20.80%
• 6M: 21.45%
• 1Y: 175.49%
• 3Y*: 75.34%
• 5Y*: 29.99%
• 10Y*: 22.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFIG vs. CENX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF	-0.33%	-0.09%
CENX Century Aluminum Company	20.80%	28.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MFIG and CENX is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.20

Return for Risk

MFIG vs. CENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFIG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CENX

CENX Risk / Return Rank: 92
CENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CENX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
CENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CENX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFIG vs. CENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFIG	CENX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.76	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.01	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.39	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	5.66	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	19.66	—

Drawdowns

MFIG vs. CENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum CENX drawdown of -98.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and CENX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFIG	CENX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.29%	-98.67%	+84.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-31.18%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-42.77%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-82.10%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.50%	-40.83%	+34.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.61%	-61.09%	+56.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.96%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MFIG	CENX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	22.48%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	47.80%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.10%	64.00%	-46.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.10%	72.22%	-55.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.10%	70.65%	-53.55%

Dividends

MFIG vs. CENX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MFIG nor CENX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFIG and CENX in my portfolio?

MFIG and CENX have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.