MFIG vs. CENX
Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX).
MFIG is a passively managed fund by Motley Fool that tracks the performance of the Motley Fool Innovative Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2025.
Performance
MFIG vs. CENX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFIG vs. CENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | -9.96% | -0.21% |
CENX Century Aluminum Company | 62.10% | 29.22% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a -9.96% return, which is significantly lower than CENX's 62.10% return.
MFIG
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -9.96%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CENX
- 1D
- 8.21%
- 1M
- 23.67%
- YTD
- 62.10%
- 6M
- 116.02%
- 1Y
- 245.16%
- 3Y*
- 85.19%
- 5Y*
- 29.78%
- 10Y*
- 24.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFIG vs. CENX — Risk / Return Rank
MFIG
CENX
MFIG vs. CENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Century Aluminum Company (CENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFIG | CENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.35 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.71 | 0.08 | -1.79 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFIG and CENX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MFIG vs. CENX - Dividend Comparison
Neither MFIG nor CENX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
MFIG vs. CENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum CENX drawdown of -98.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and CENX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFIG | CENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -98.67% | +84.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -82.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -87.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.48% | -20.60% | +9.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.18% | -61.38% | +56.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 9.37% | — |
Volatility
MFIG vs. CENX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFIG | CENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 50.74% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.39% | 68.94% | -51.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 72.94% | -55.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.39% | 70.76% | -53.37% |