TMFS vs. JHSC
TMFS (Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF) and JHSC (John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. TMFS is actively managed, while JHSC is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMFS returned -1.01%/yr vs 8.28%/yr for JHSC. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMFS charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for JHSC.
Performance
TMFS vs. JHSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFS achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than JHSC's 14.88% return.
TMFS
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 2.07%
- 6M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 0.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.79%
- 5Y*
- -1.01%
- 10Y*
- —
JHSC
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 8.74%
- YTD
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- 20.74%
- 3Y*
- 13.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.28%
- 10Y*
- —
TMFS vs. JHSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | 1.80% | -1.59% | 15.41% | 25.40% | -33.15% | -2.38% | 58.52% | 40.19% | -6.14% |
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 14.88% | 6.88% | 9.74% | 20.77% | -14.65% | 19.55% | 11.60% | 24.43% | -7.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFS and JHSC is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2018 | 0.84 |
The correlation between TMFS and JHSC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
TMFS vs. JHSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFS
JHSC
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TMFS
JHSC
Industrials
TMFS
JHSC
Healthcare
TMFS
JHSC
Financial Services
TMFS
JHSC
Consumer Cyclical
TMFS
JHSC
Real Estate
TMFS
JHSC
Energy
TMFS
JHSC
Basic Materials
TMFS
JHSC
Consumer Defensive
TMFS
JHSC
Communication Services
TMFS
-
JHSC
Utilities
TMFS
-
JHSC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFS vs. JHSC — Risk / Return Rank
TMFS
JHSC
TMFS vs. JHSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) and John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFS | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.23 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 2.16 | -2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.02 | 7.52 | -7.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFS vs. JHSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFS drawdown since its inception was -48.79%, which is greater than JHSC's maximum drawdown of -42.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFS and JHSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFS | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.79% | -42.66% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.73% | -9.63% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.05% | -25.16% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.68% | -25.21% | -20.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.52% | -1.05% | -16.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.45% | -7.69% | -11.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.74% | 2.77% | +2.97% |
Volatility
TMFS vs. JHSC - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF (TMFS) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF (JHSC) at 3.39%. This indicates that TMFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFS | JHSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 3.39% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.11% | 11.21% | +2.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.86% | 16.18% | +3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.03% | 20.11% | +2.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.44% | 22.12% | +3.32% |
TMFS vs. JHSC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFS has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JHSC's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFS vs. JHSC - Dividend Comparison
TMFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JHSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHSC John Hancock Multifactor Small Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 0.96% | 0.98% | 1.13% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.14% | 1.09% |
TMFS Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.34% | 2.37% | 5.57% | 2.65% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFS and JHSC have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFS has higher volatility (4.87%) compared to JHSC (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFS dropped -48.79% vs JHSC's -42.66%.
On 5-year performance, JHSC leads with 8.28% vs -1.01% for TMFS. On fees, JHSC is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, JHSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JHSC has performed better with a 8.28% return vs -1.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JHSC is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TMFS.
JHSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.00% for TMFS.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for TMFS and 0.42% for JHSC.
JHSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFS and JHSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer